Role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia
© Jain et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 25 January 2008
Accepted: 20 June 2008
Published: 20 June 2008
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia (ARVD) is a genetic cardiomyopathy characterized clinically by ventricular arrhythmias and progressive right ventricular (RV) dysfunction. The histopathologic hallmark is fibro-fatty replacement of RV myocardium. It is inherited in an autosomal pattern with variable penetrance. ARVD is unique in that it most commonly presents in young, otherwise healthy and highly athletic individuals. The cause of ARVD is not well-known but recent evidence suggests strongly that it is a disease of desmosomal dysfunction. The disease involvement is not limited only to the RV as left ventricle (LV) has also been reportedly affected. Diagnosis of ARVD is challenging and is currently based upon a multi-disciplinary work-up of the patient as defined by the Task Force. Currently, implanted cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) are routinely used to prevent sudden death in patients with ARVD. Cardiovascular MR is an important non-invasive diagnostic modality that allows both qualitative and quantitative evaluation of RV. This article reviews the genetics of ARVD, current status and role of CMR in the diagnosis of ARVD and LV involvement in ARVD.
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia (ARVD) is a progressive cardiomyopathy primarily affecting the right ventricle (RV) and is characterized by fatty/fibro-fatty replacement with myocyte loss, ventricular arrhythmias of left bundle branch block pattern (LBBB) and right heart failure. Increasing evidence suggests that ARVD is a disease of desmosomal dysfunction. ARVD can exist in both sporadic and familial forms with the familial form showing a predominantly autosomal dominant inheritance pattern with variable penetrance. The exact prevalence is unknown, but it is estimated to be 1:5000 in the United States. The clinical onset of ARVD is often delayed to adolescence or early adulthood. It is more commonly seen in males and people engaged in athletics and competitive sports.
ARVD accounts for up to 5% of sudden deaths in young individuals less than 35 years of age in the United States, and 25% of exercise-related deaths in Veneto, Italy [1, 2]. The death rate for patients with ARVD has been estimated at 2.5% per year . The main differential diagnosis of ARVD consists of right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) tachycardia, sarcoidosis, idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, isolated myocarditis, adipomatosis cordis, mitral valve prolapse, non-coronary precordial ST-segment elevation (Brugada syndrome) and the Uhl anomaly, which is characterized by a paper-thin RV due to almost complete absence of myocardial fibers .
Criteria for diagnosis of ARVD 
I. Global and/or Regional Dysfunction and Structural Alterations*
Severe dilatation and reduction of right ventricular ejection fraction with no (or only mild) left ventricular impairment
Localized right ventricular aneurysms (akinetic or dyskinetic areas with diastolic bulging)
Severe segmental dilatation of the right ventricle
Mild global right ventricular dilatation and/or ejection fraction reduction with normal left ventricle
Mild segmental dilatation of the right ventricle
Regional right ventricular hypokinesia
II. Tissue Characterization of Wall
Fibrofatty replacement of myocardium on endomyocardial biopsy
III. Repolarisation Abnormalities
Inverted T waves in right precordial leads (V2 and V3) in people aged >12 years, in absence of right bundle branch block
IV. Depolarization/Conduction Abnormalities
Epsilon waves or localized prolongation (>110 ms) of the QRS complex in right precordial leads (V1 - V3)
Late potentials (signal-averaged ECG)
Left bundle branch block type ventricular tachycardia (sustained and non-sustained) by ECG, Holter or exercise testing
Frequent ventricular extra-systoles (>1000/24 hours) by Holter
VI. Family History
Familial disease confirmed at necropsy or surgery
Family history of premature sudden death (<35 years) due to suspected right ventricular dysplasia
Familial history (clinical diagnosis based on present criteria)
Important morphological patterns of ARVD manifestation include myocyte loss with fibro-fatty replacement of the ventricular myocardium, focal thinning of ventricular free wall, wall hypertrophy, focal bulging of the RV wall in diastole and RVOT enlargement. Functionally, the disease may result in global or regional contraction abnormalities, RV systolic/diastolic dysfunction, RV dilatation and RV aneurysms. The imaging modalities used for RV assessment in ARVD include conventional angiography, echocardiography, radionuclide angiography, computed tomography (CT) and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). The standard of reference for the diagnosis of ARVD has been the histo-pathological demonstration of fibro-fatty replacement of the RV myocardium at either surgery or autopsy. Unfortunately biopsy carries risk of perforation and has low sensitivity on account of the segmental nature of fatty infiltration. The major therapeutic decision involved in the care of a patient with ARVD involves the decision to implant an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). Anti-arrhythmic drug therapy and catheter ablation may be useful to decrease the frequency of sustained ventricular arrhythmias and ICD firing. In case of intractable RV failure or incessant ventricular arrhythmias which are refractory to anti-arrhythmic drug therapy and/or catheter ablation, cardiac transplantation may be an option for treating patients with ARVD.
As novel mutations in desmosomal proteins are being reported, the relationships between genetic mutation and phenotypic expression are beginning to be understood, particularly in the context of CMR diagnosis. This review discusses these relationships and the role of CMR for evaluation of patients with ARVD.
Genetic basis of ARVD
ARVD is known to occur in both sporadic and familial forms, with familial disease accounting for an estimated 30% to 80% cases . Familial ARVD is primarily autosomal dominant, with several sub-types identified and mapped to distinct genetic loci to date – ARVD1 (14q24.3) , ARVD2 (1q42) , ARVD3 (14q11-q12) , ARVD4 (2q32) , ARVD5 (3p23) , ARVD6 (10p12-p14) , ARVD7 (10q22) , ARVD8 (6p24) , ARVD9 (12p11) , ARVD10 (8q12) and ARVD11 (18q21) . Besides, two autosomal recessive syndromic forms of ARVD – Naxos disease (17q21) and Carvajal syndrome (6p23-24) are also known which involve skin and hair as well as heart [16–18]. An autosomal dominant association of non-epidermolytic palmo-plantar keratoderma, woolly hair, and dilated right ventricle was reported by Tosti et al. in an Italian family .
Candidate genes for ARVD 
Components of the desmosome
Desmosomal cadherins (desmocollins; desmogleins)*
Tyrosine kinases that phosphorylate desmosomal proteins
Components of the adherens junction
γ-catenin (junctional plakoglobin)*
Constituents of the gap junction
Cardiac ryanodine receptor*
Components of dystrophic-glycoprotein complex
Myotonic dystrophy protein kinase-1
Transforming growth factor β3*
ARVD shows polymorphic expressivity with variable clinical expression of PKP2 mutations even among first-degree relatives ranging from a complete lack of symptoms to a severe disease phenotype experiencing sudden cardiac death (SCD)/right or biventricular heart failure. This large heterogeneity in clinical expression can be attributed to factors such as involvement of different desmosomal genes, different mutations within the same gene and effect-modification by other genetic and environmental factors. Dominant ARVD due to PKP2 mutations has also widely been shown to have an age-dependent, variable penetrance which could again be attributed to modifier genes, environmental influences and gender effects [24–29]. In contrast to dominant disease and heterozygous recessive carriers, homozygous recessive forms of ARVD show 100% penetrance by adolescence, with syncope as the usual symptomatic presentation .
The genetic patterns of ARVD are complex, with heterogeneity in causative genetic mutations and abnormality within the same gene showing varied patterns of inheritance and phenotypic expression and vice versa. Mutations in DSP have been shown to underlie autosomal dominant and recessive skin disorders, with or without cardiac involvement . Awad et al reported the first case of recessive ARVD caused by a novel cryptic splice mutation in PKP2  and Francis et al reported recessive ARVD with anterior polar cataracts in a consanguineous family from Argentina . Djabali et al reported extensive locus heterogeneity for Naxos syndrome and described exclusion of DSP, JUP, and several other components of the desmosome in two families with Naxos syndrome [34, 35]. It is speculated that like other inherited cardiovascular diseases particularly hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and long QT syndrome, a small minority of ARVD cases may have more than one co-existent mutations. Although this is yet to be proven, digenic inheritance with a gene dose effect might however account for many unexplained observations, including relatives with mild but definite disease affliction who are "negative" for the family mutation and variable penetrance and expressivity in families with apparently identical genotype .
Gene expression in the pathogenesis of ARVD
Identification of causative desmosomal mutations has resulted in ARVD to be increasingly viewed upon as a desmosomal disease and has provided insight into its pathogenesis. Mutations affecting components of the cardiac desmosome are believed to disrupt cell-cell adhesion, provoking detachment of myocytes particularly under conditions of mechanical stress. This, in turn, might lead to apoptosis and cell necrosis, predisposing to inflammation and repair by fibro fatty substitution.
Accordingly, early ARVD shows predilection for the regions of heart with relatively thinner walls and high shear stress – the subtricuspid portion, outflow tract, apex and mid-free wall of the RV ("triangle of dysplasia") and the inferior wall septal junction and infero-lateral wall of the LV. Young individuals and athletes are predisposed because of high level of physical activity and resultant greater strain on heart. Gap junction remodeling associated with impaired mechanical coupling at cell adhesion junctions may result in a predisposition to the arrhythmogenicity seen in ARVD. Furthermore, adrenergic stimulation during highly strenuous activity may precipitate arrhythmic events in patients with ARVD. Desmosomal mutations may induce nuclear protein dysfunction as desmosomal proteins are believed to be involved in regulation of transcription. Desmosomal mutations may also heighten the pathogenic role of viral infection speculated in the causation of ARVD [34, 36, 37].
A pathogenic role of cytoplasmic calcium overload is shown by the association of mutations in RYR2 with ARVD2. This type of ARVD has a very different clinical presentation and is rather distinct from the more common types of ARVD. RYR2 has also been independently implicated in isolated familial catecholaminergic polymorphic VT (CPVT) reflecting possibly different mutations within the same gene and the probable role of effect-modification by individual genetic make-ups and environmental influences in different phenotypic expressions of the same genetic abnormality . Finally, alterations in cytokines such as TGFβ3 may also contribute to disease progression as TGFβ3 is known to induce fibrotic response by stimulating mesenchymal cells and has been shown to modulate expression of genes encoding desmosomal proteins in different cell types and regulate stability of cell-cell junctional complexes . A link between the mutations in the genes involved in ARVD and induction of apoptotic death of myocardiocytes is believed to exist but remains speculative and is yet to be proven .
Role of genetic screening and Task Force diagnostic criteria
There have been a number of studies addressing the issue of prevalence of PKP2 mutations in different groups of ARVD patients [6, 25, 26, 28, 40]. Both Dalal et al in the United States  and van Tintelen et al in the Netherlands  working independently found the prevalence of mutations in PKP2 among unrelated ARVD probands to be 43%. Tintelen et al additionally discovered that the rate of PKP2 mutations was as high as 70% in cases with familial ARVD and no PKP2 mutations were identifiable in cases with non-familial sporadic phenotype. The high prevalence of PKP2 mutations among ARVD patients points towards a potential role of mutation analysis in PKP2 mutation positive ARVD cases and their family members . Cases with PKP2 mutations did not differ significantly from those without PKP2 mutations with regard to clinical characteristics and outcomes, except for earlier age of first clinical presentation and first arrhythmia and more frequent negative T waves in V2 and V3 . Additionally, patients with a PKP2 mutation undergo ICD interventions irrespective of the classic risk factors determining ICD intervention in ARVD patients . Although molecular genetic analysis is unlikely to contribute significantly to prediction of clinical phenotype and risk stratification, it has potential for family screening and preclinical diagnosis, particularly for patients with early/incomplete disease expression [25, 29].
In keeping with variable penetrance and multi-factorial causation of ARVD, the mere inheritance of a mutation previously identified in a proband does not imply a diagnosis of ARVD in a family member, in the absence of clinical diagnostic criteria. Conversely, a fully negative family history could suggest a case of novel mutation or alternatively, a different disease mimicking ARVD such as sarcoidosis, chagas disease, enterovirus infection, chronic right-side myocarditis or sub-acute bartonella infection . The prognostic value of early identification of asymptomatic gene carriers may be limited because a reliable algorithm for primary prevention of sudden death in familial ARVD is lacking and risk stratification in asymptomatic relatives has not been systematically addressed [29, 41].
In order to account for the broader spectrum of disease in familial ARVD, it has been suggested that the Task Force criteria be modified such that the presence of any minor criterion in first degree relative of a proven case of ARVD be regarded as clinical disease expression [42, 43]. Syrris et al  found that the application of modified criteria does expand the diagnostic yield but also may lead to false positives because several family members assumed to be clinically affected were subsequently found to be gene negative. Thus to date the interpretation of minor repolarisation abnormalities in first-degree relatives remains inconclusive.
In summary, a positive genetic result can only be a part of a more comprehensive and multi-disciplinary diagnostic protocol and work-up involving ECG, arrhythmic, morpho-functional, histo-pathological, and clinical/molecular genetic findings . More complete understanding of the underlying genetic basis and the pathogenesis of ARVD will facilitate diagnosis, prognostication and therapeutic decision-making in patients which would be of great significance since adverse clinical outcomes such as SCD occur without premonitory symptoms in many cases.
CMR of ARVD
Morphologic and functional abnormalities are found most commonly in the "triangle of dysplasia" . Tandri et al systemically described qualitative and quantitative CMR findings in patients meeting Task Force criteria for the diagnosis of ARVD using state-of-the-art CMR . Intra-myocardial fat was noted in a high percentage (75%) of patients who met the Task Force criteria for ARVD, more commonly in the basal regions (RV inflow and outflow) and lateral apex. Trabecular disarray was seen more frequently than wall thinning and aneurysms. RV dimensions and volumes usually are significantly different in ARVD compared to normals and hence useful in the diagnosis of ARVD [54, 55].
ECG-gated steady-state free precession imaging (SSFP) pulse sequences (FIESTA, true-FISP, balanced fast field echo) have led to improvements in cine CMR in terms of better contrast between blood and myocardium, better delineation of endocardial borders and more accurate and reliable volumetric measurements of the ventricle as compared to segmented k-space cine gradient echo (GRE) images [e.g. fast low-angle shot (FLASH), fast cardiac-gated gradient-echo (FASTCARD)] . Signal intensity in SSFP is not affected by reduction in velocity of flowing blood in cases of dysfunctional RV as compared to GRE imaging. Schick et al  implemented chemical shift-selective sequence to breath-hold cine gradient-echo CMR and found that it improved tissue characterization and differentiation of areas with fibrosis and fatty degeneration from normal myocardial tissue. The use of chemical shift fat suppression (Figure 1B) may also better reveal the true thickness of the RV wall, making the identification of wall thinning or wall hypertrophy in ARVD more reliable .
Cardiac-gated spin-echo (SE) pulse sequences have conventionally been used for evaluation of cardiac morphology. CMR black-blood techniques have been developed for cardiovascular imaging to improve segmentation of myocardium from the blood pool. Black blood in the cardiac chambers is achieved by saturation of inflowing blood signal both above and below the acquired volume.
Current black blood CMR techniques (Figure 1A) use a breath-hold fast SE CMR sequence with a dual magnetization preparation pulse (double inversion-recovery) [58–61]. Breath-hold sequences provide end-diastolic images with reduced motion artifacts and improved resolution of myocardial detail. Our group found that CMR obtained using a double R-R fast SE sequence with a short echo time (TE) of 30 msec, an echo train length (ETL) of 24–32 or less if possible, a section thickness of 5 mm, and field of view (FOV) of 24–28 cm were superior to those obtained using other sequences .
CMR Protocol for ARVD
1: Sagittal Scout: any rapid image localizer
2: Axial Black Blood Images: double inversion recovery TSE/FSE
Axial imaging plane provides the best view of the right ventricular anterior wall and the right ventricular outflow tract. Prescribe the axial images starting from the diaphragm to the pulmonary artery.
TR = 2 R-R intervals
TE = 5 msec (minimum-full) (GE); TE 30 msec (Siemens)
Slice thickness = 5 mm
Interslice gap = 5 mm and
Field of view (FOV) = 28 cm
3: Axial SSFP Bright Blood Cine Images
Same superior to inferior coverage as sequence 2.
TR = 3.5 msec (GE); TR 40–50 msec (Siemens)
TE = minimum
Flip angle = 45–70°
Slice thickness = 8 mm
Interslice gap = 2 mm
FOV = 36–40 cm
16–20 views per segment
Parallel imaging n = 2 is optional
4: Vertical and long axis cine images (2, 4 chamber view)
The parameters for this sequence are the same as sequence 3.
5: Short-axis Black Blood Images
The parameters for this sequence are the same as sequence 2.
6: Axial Black Blood Images with Fat Suppression (Optional sequence)
This sequence is optional and usually adds 10 extra minutes to the total scanning time. Repeat series 2 with chemical selective fat suppression.
7: Short-axis SSFP cine
This sequence is prescribed from the four-chamber view. Cover the entire left ventricle. These are performed after gadolinium administration, in order to give time for gadolinium washout. The parameters are identical to sequence 3.
8: TI scout
4 chamber view, using TI scout sequences or trial TI times to suppress normal myocardium.
9: Delayed gadolinium short axis images (10–15 min delay)
Same slice coverage as short axis cine images.
TR/TE per manufacturer recommendations
TI : optimized to suppress the left ventricle
Flip angle = 20–25°
Slice thickness = 8 mm
Interslice gap = 2 mm
FOV = 36–40 cm
No parallel imaging
Use phase sensitive inversion recovery if available (PSIR)
10: Delayed gadolinium axial axis images
Same slice coverage as axial cine images. Pulse sequence same as sequence 9.
TI : optimized to suppress the right ventricle
Use phase sensitive inversion recovery if available (PSIR)
Role of CMR in diagnosis of ARVD
Sensitivity and specificity of CMR detection of RV intra-myocardial fat in diagnosis of ARVD is variable, ranging from 22% to 100% [44, 48, 52, 54, 62]. Identifying fat can be challenging because the RV is a thin structure and areas of affected myocardium can be quite small. It may be particularly difficult to distinguish pathologic adipose infiltration in areas where adjacent epicardial fat is normally present such as in AV groove and antero-apical portion of RV.
Castillo et al  demonstrated that even state-of-the-art clinical CMR protocols using double inversion-recovery fast SE sequences may be limited in both spatial and contrast resolution for detecting fine intra-myocardial structural detail in ARVD. The presence of signal intensity increase seen in T1 weighted images is not specific for fat. Proximity to the surface coil, truncation band artifacts, and various motion-related artifacts may cause projection of high signal intensities onto the myocardium and be mistaken for fat. Similarly, artifacts related to arrhythmia, breathing motion, and blood flow can also produce high signal intensity in the free wall of the RV .
The varying sensitivities that have been reported for CMR to detect intra-myocardial fat can be ascribed to patient selection, which includes not only those with overt forms of the disease with extensive morpho-functional alterations and inducible arrhythmias, but also those with concealed forms without global dysfunction and without inducible arrhythmias . Isolated areas of fat replacement have also been reported in elderly patients, long-term steroid use, other cardiomyopathies and in idiopathic RVOT tachycardia, which forms an important differential diagnosis of ARVD . Obesity may be associated with fatty replacement of the RV wall . Macedo et al  reported that lipomatous infiltration of RV on cine CMR may occur without global or regional functional abnormalities suggestive of ARVD. Thus RV fat replacement may be a distinct disorder in itself and does not always imply ARVD.
The reliability of detecting increased intra-myocardial T1 signal is probably low. Bluemke et al  reported that identification of high T1 fat signal is less reliable than RV measurements or other morphological changes in ARVD.
Abbara at al  reported that applying fat-suppressed sequences to conventional fast spin-echo (FSE) imaging leads to an increase in the inter-reader reproducibility and confidence for intra-myocardial fat infiltration, also allowing identification of even subtle to mild degrees of intra-myocardial fatty infiltration (although the significance of such minor fatty changes with respect to their association with ARVD is not clear). Tandri at al  similarly found good inter-observer agreement for fat and excellent reliability for other qualitative and quantitative variables among experienced CMR readers by the use of a uniform imaging protocol and application of fat-suppression on breath-hold double-inversion recovery blood suppression pulses. However both Bluemke et al  and Tandri et al  concluded that the identification of fat within the myocardium is the least specific and least reproducible of any of the other parameters in the CMR evaluation of ARVD. Furthermore, it should be noted that fat signal by imaging tests is not a Task Force criterion for the diagnosis of ARVD.
By the application of CMR, Harper et al  confirmed that RV free wall thinning is independently predictive of the presence of ARVD. They quantified RV free wall thinning in ARVD and reported that RV free wall thickness (RVFWT) of less than 5 mm is suspicious for ARVD, between 5 and 8 mm is indeterminate and greater than 8 mm is highly improbable to represent ARVD. Thinning of the RV free wall has been noted as a significant abnormality in ARVD. However, like fat, qualitative evaluation of CMR RVFWT in ARVD may be compromised by thinness of the normal RV free wall, limited in-plane resolution, adjacent high epicardial fat signal and motion artifacts. Like fat, free-wall thinning is also not a part of the Task Force criteria.
Late-enhancement (LE) CMR has the potential to identify myocardial fibro-fatty changes in both RV and LV in ARVD [51, 67]. CMR findings suggesting fibrous tissue additionally show correlation with histo-pathological findings and also show association with RV dysfunction and inducibility of VT on electrophysiological (EP) testing . Fibro-fatty variety of ARVD is more common than fatty ARVD. Documentation of fibrous tissue has been suggested to be diagnostically more important than finding fat alone. Fat replacement of RV without fibrosis probably represents a distinct clinico-pathological entity that may not be considered synonymous with ARVD. Fibrous tissue replacement of the myocardium is also believed to be more arrhythmogenic than fat alone .
A potential role of CMR lies in its ability to detect early and subtle cases of ARVD which are otherwise insensitive to diagnosis by Task Force criteria, posing a real diagnostic dilemma. In patients with structurally severe disease, all imaging modalities are likely to provide abnormal findings and the ability of CMR to do so therefore does not stand out . CMR can uniquely detect regional and diastolic (right and left) ventricular dysfunction [48, 70] which may represent earliest manifestations of ARVD, a continually evolving and progressive disease.
Regional functional abnormalities of RV in ARVD include focal hypokinesis (systolic wall thickening of <40%), akinesis (systolic wall thickening of <10%), dyskinesis (movement of myocardial segment outward in systole), and aneurysms (segments with persistent bulging in diastole and dyskinetic in systole) . Myocardial tissue tagging may potentially improve the sensitivity of CMR to detect regional dysfunction in ARVD because visual analysis is often inadequate due to the complex contraction pattern of the RV . However, tissue tagging is not easily applied due to the very thin RV free wall and poor signal to noise ratio .
MR imaging is a useful tool in the evaluation of patients with suspected ARVD. However, it is important to recognize that CMR is not a "gold standard" for the diagnosis of ARVD. But rather, CMR is one of a number of tests which should be employed in the evaluation of patients with suspected ARVD. Other tests which should be performed include a 12 lead electrocardiogram (ECG), signal-averaged ECG (SAECG), Holter monitor, stress test, and echocardiogram. If these tests suggest ARVD, we at our institution, typically recommend biopsy to confirm the diagnosis and exclude other potential etiologies (such as sarcoidosis) mainly in sporadic cases as well as EP study as a part of risk stratification . Great caution must be employed when the only abnormalities which are seen are observed with CMR. In our experience, CMR imaging can result in an over-diagnosis of ARVD. As noted above, many abnormalities which can be seen with CMR, particularly wall thinning and the presence of fat are nonspecific findings. This is important as misdiagnosis of ARVD has great implications not only for the patient but for the family as well. It is extremely uncommon to have an entirely normal 12 lead ECG and have ARVD. Therefore, CMR abnormalities observed in a patient with a normal 12 lead ECG should be interpreted with great caution .
Currently, two large clinical trials are under-way that use CMR for ARVD diagnosis. The European ARVD registry  attempts prospective validation of criteria for clinical diagnosis of ARVD, evaluation of accuracy of clinical diagnosis and assessment of the natural course of disease . The Multidisciplinary Study of Right Ventricular Dysplasia (U.S. ARVD study)  aims to prospectively enroll 100 ARVD patients with 500 first-degree relatives with the following scientific goals: 1) to study a large group of newly diagnosed patients with this uncommon disorder, 2) to elucidate the genetic etiology of this disease, 3) to evaluate treatment of ARVD in these patients. These studies may help better define the role of CMR in ARVD in cases and family members.
Left ventricular involvement in ARVD
LV involvement in ARVD has been increasingly described, with prevalence reported as 16%  to 76% . Hebert et al  reported a subnormal LV ejection fraction (EF) by angiography in 20% of a group of ARVD patients. Hunold et al  detected LE in the LV in 2 of 6 ARVD patients. Peters and Reil  reported that despite a normal LVEF, 40% of their 60 ARVD patients had LV wall motion abnormalities. Bauce et al  found LV abnormalities in half of the patients in their study population with echocardiographic evidence of ARVD. Sen-Chowdhry et al  demonstrated LV abnormalities with preserved RV function in 40% of their ARVD cohort.
Lindstrom et al  demonstrated LV abnormalities in 93% of their ARVD patients by myocardial perfusion scintigraphy and echocardiography. Manyari et al  discovered latent LV dysfunction to be present in all cases of ARVD by uncovering it during exercise testing. Evolution of LV involvement in ARVD has been demonstrated in terms of appearance of new abnormalities or worsening of existing abnormalities or both, with progression of RV disease on long-term follow-up.
These cases of early and/or predominant LV involvement in ARVD have brought into question the traditional consideration of LV involvement as only an end-stage complication of progressive RV dilatation and dysfunction in ARVD. Although there is not a complete agreement in literature, LV involvement in ARVD may not stand for a separate disorder, but may be part of a larger disease process extending across the entire heart supporting the adoption of a broader term "arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy" with appropriate sub-classifications .
Mechanisms of LV involvement in ARVD
The most common variant of ARVD has been postulated to be biventricular with LV involvement from its early stages. The rationale for this is the classification of ARVD as a desmosomal disease and desmosomal genes are expressed in both ventricles. Desmosomal mutations that primarily affect cell adhesion may affect the distensible, thin-walled RV earlier in the course of the disease. LV dysfunction in ARVD may also be secondary to the enlarged and poorly functioning RV because physiologically heart cannot be compartmentalized into functionally independent right and left sides.
Clinical expression of LV involvement
Fibro-fatty replacement of the LV shows correlation with myocardial perfusion defects predominantly located in antero-septal and basal posterior segments of the LV, adjacent to the parts of the RV most frequently affected by the disease . Other quantitative and qualitative LV abnormalities that have reportedly been noted in ARVD, like RV, include increased LV end-diastolic pressure, decreased EF, AV block, regional wall motion abnormalities, aneurysms (most frequently at the apex), presence of asynergic areas (most frequently located at the apex or the infero-posterior wall) and dilatation .
LV involvement in ARVD appears histologically similar to the RV findings or is only fibrotic . Pinamonti et al found discrete small diverticula of the LV wall on angiography which were thought to represent some localized muscle defect as a component of the underlying ongoing dysplastic process . LV involvement has been detected even in asymptomatic patients and in those with a short duration of symptoms [80, 84, 85]. LV involvement is more common and more severe in families with several members affected with ARVD [83, 86]. LV involvement is associated with increased myocardial mass, inflammatory infiltrates, clinical arrhythmic events and more severe RV wall thinning and heart failure. Frank left-sided heart failure is unusual.
LV involvement and Task Force criteria
When Task Force criteria were first proposed, minimal LV disease was a stipulation, intended to improve specificity of a then little known disease and ensure distinction from related disorders such as dilated cardiomyopathy. It appears likely that descriptions of LV involvement may be included in subsequent revisions of the diagnostic criteria for ARVD .
ARVD presents a diagnostic challenge on account of the inherent difficulty in its diagnosis using conventional methods, lack of clinical experience due to the rare nature of disease and high frequency of misdiagnosis of the condition. Also, there is no gold standard for its diagnosis and the Task Force criteria which are currently relied upon have never been validated. CMR plays an important role in the diagnosis of ARVD that is both qualitative and quantitative. The recent expansion of the genetic understanding for ARVD will underscore the importance of noninvasive imaging techniques for early phenotypic characterization of this disorder.
List of abbreviations used
arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia
cardiovascular magnetic resonance
echo train length
field of view
fast spin echo
implantable cardioverter defibrillator
left bundle branch block
right ventricle free wall thickness
right ventricular outflow tract
sudden cardiac death
steady state free precession
turbo spin echo
wall motion abnormality
The Johns Hopkins ARVD program is funded by a private grant from the Bogle Foundation. This study is also supported by the National Institutes of Health Research Grant 1 UO1 HL65594-01A1.
- Corrado D, Thiene G, Nava A, Rossi L, Pennelli N: Sudden death in young competitive athletes: clinicopathologic correlations in 22 cases. Am J Med. 1990, 89 (5): 588-596. 10.1016/0002-9343(90)90176-E.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thiene G, Nava A, Corrado D, Rossi L, Pennelli N: Right ventricular cardiomyopathy and sudden death in young people. N Engl J Med. 1988, 318 (3): 129-133.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fontaine G, Fontaliran F, Hebert JL, Chemla D, Zenati O, Lecarpentier Y, Frank R: Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia. Annu Rev Med. 1999, 50: 17-35. 10.1146/annurev.med.50.1.17.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fontaine G, Fontaliran F, Frank R: Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathies: clinical forms and main differential diagnoses. Circulation. 1998, 97 (16): 1532-1535.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- McKenna WJ, Thiene G, Nava A, Fontaliran F, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Fontaine G, Camerini F: Diagnosis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy. Task Force of the Working Group Myocardial and Pericardial Disease of the European Society of Cardiology and of the Scientific Council on Cardiomyopathies of the International Society and Federation of Cardiology. Br Heart J. 1994, 71 (3): 215-218. 10.1136/hrt.71.3.215.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gerull B, Heuser A, Wichter T, Paul M, Basson CT, McDermott DA, Lerman BB, Markowitz SM, Ellinor PT, MacRae CA, Peters S, Grossmann KS, Drenckhahn J, Michely B, Sasse-Klaassen S, Birchmeier W, Dietz R, Breithardt G, Schulze-Bahr E, Thierfelder L: Mutations in the desmosomal protein plakophilin-2 are common in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. Nat Genet. 2004, 36 (11): 1162-1164. 10.1038/ng1461.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rampazzo A, Nava A, Danieli GA, Buja G, Daliento L, Fasoli G, Scognamiglio R, Corrado D, Thiene G: The gene for arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy maps to chromosome 14q23-q24. Hum Mol Genet. 1994, 3 (6): 959-962. 10.1093/hmg/3.6.959.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rampazzo A, Nava A, Erne P, Eberhard M, Vian E, Slomp P, Tiso N, Thiene G, Danieli GA: A new locus for arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVD2) maps to chromosome 1q42-q43. Hum Mol Genet. 1995, 4 (11): 2151-2154. 10.1093/hmg/4.11.2151.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Severini GM, Krajinovic M, Pinamonti B, Sinagra G, Fioretti P, Brunazzi MC, Falaschi A, Camerini F, Giacca M, Mestroni L: A new locus for arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia on the long arm of chromosome 14. Genomics. 1996, 31 (2): 193-200. 10.1006/geno.1996.0031.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rampazzo A, Nava A, Miorin M, Fonderico P, Pope B, Tiso N, Livolsi B, Zimbello R, Thiene G, Danieli GA: ARVD4, a new locus for arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, maps to chromosome 2 long arm. Genomics. 1997, 45 (2): 259-263. 10.1006/geno.1997.4927.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ahmad F, Li D, Karibe A, Gonzalez O, Tapscott T, Hill R, Weilbaecher D, Blackie P, Furey M, Gardner M, Bachinski LL, Roberts R: Localization of a gene responsible for arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia to chromosome 3p23. Circulation. 1998, 98 (25): 2791-2795.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li D, Ahmad F, Gardner MJ, Weilbaecher D, Hill R, Karibe A, Gonzalez O, Tapscott T, Sharratt GP, Bachinski LL, Roberts R: The locus of a novel gene responsible for arrhythmogenic right-ventricular dysplasia characterized by early onset and high penetrance maps to chromosome 10p12-p14. American journal of human genetics. 2000, 66 (1): 148-156. 10.1086/302713.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Melberg A, Oldfors A, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Stalberg E, Carlsson B, Larsson E, Lidell C, Eeg-Olofsson KE, Wikstrom G, Henriksson KG, Dahl N: Autosomal dominant myofibrillar myopathy with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy linked to chromosome 10q. Ann Neurol. 1999, 46 (5): 684-692. 10.1002/1531-8249(199911)46:5<684::AID-ANA2>3.0.CO;2-#.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rampazzo A, Nava A, Malacrida S, Beffagna G, Bauce B, Rossi V, Zimbello R, Simionati B, Basso C, Thiene G, Towbin JA, Danieli GA: Mutation in human desmoplakin domain binding to plakoglobin causes a dominant form of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. American journal of human genetics. 2002, 71 (5): 1200-1206. 10.1086/344208.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Moric-Janiszewska E, Markiewicz-Loskot G: Review on the genetics of arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia. Europace. 2007, 9 (5): 259-266. 10.1093/europace/eum034.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Norgett EE, Hatsell SJ, Carvajal-Huerta L, Cabezas JC, Common J, Purkis PE, Whittock N, Leigh IM, Stevens HP, Kelsell DP: Recessive mutation in desmoplakin disrupts desmoplakin-intermediate filament interactions and causes dilated cardiomyopathy, woolly hair and keratoderma. Hum Mol Genet. 2000, 9 (18): 2761-2766. 10.1093/hmg/9.18.2761.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- McKoy G, Protonotarios N, Crosby A, Tsatsopoulou A, Anastasakis A, Coonar A, Norman M, Baboonian C, Jeffery S, McKenna WJ: Identification of a deletion in plakoglobin in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy with palmoplantar keratoderma and woolly hair (Naxos disease). Lancet. 2000, 355 (9221): 2119-2124. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02379-5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Protonotarios N, Tsatsopoulou A, Patsourakos P, Alexopoulos D, Gezerlis P, Simitsis S, Scampardonis G: Cardiac abnormalities in familial palmoplantar keratosis. Br Heart J. 1986, 56 (4): 321-326. 10.1136/hrt.56.4.321.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tosti A, Misciali C, Piraccini BA, Fanti PA, Barbareschi M, Ferretti RM: Woolly hair, palmoplantar keratoderma, and cardiac abnormalities: report of a family. Arch Dermatol. 1994, 130 (4): 522-524. 10.1001/archderm.130.4.522.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Beffagna G, Occhi G, Nava A, Vitiello L, Ditadi A, Basso C, Bauce B, Carraro G, Thiene G, Towbin JA, Danieli GA, Rampazzo A: Regulatory mutations in transforming growth factor-beta3 gene cause arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy type 1. Cardiovasc Res. 2005, 65 (2): 366-373. 10.1016/j.cardiores.2004.10.005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tiso N, Stephan DA, Nava A, Bagattin A, Devaney JM, Stanchi F, Larderet G, Brahmbhatt B, Brown K, Bauce B, Muriago M, Basso C, Thiene G, Danieli GA, Rampazzo A: Identification of mutations in the cardiac ryanodine receptor gene in families affected with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy type 2 (ARVD2). Hum Mol Genet. 2001, 10 (3): 189-194. 10.1093/hmg/10.3.189.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Syrris P, Ward D, Evans A, Asimaki A, Gandjbakhch E, Sen-Chowdhry S, McKenna WJ: Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy associated with mutations in the desmosomal gene desmocollin-2. American journal of human genetics. 2006, 79 (5): 978-984. 10.1086/509122.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Asimaki A, Syrris P, Wichter T, Matthias P, Saffitz JE, McKenna WJ: A novel dominant mutation in plakoglobin causes arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. American journal of human genetics. 2007, 81 (5): 964-973. 10.1086/521633.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dalal D, James C, Devanagondi R, Tichnell C, Tucker A, Prakasa K, Spevak PJ, Bluemke DA, Abraham T, Russell SD, Calkins H, Judge DP: Penetrance of mutations in plakophilin-2 among families with arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2006, 48 (7): 1416-1424. 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.06.045.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dalal D, Molin LH, Piccini J, Tichnell C, James C, Bomma C, Prakasa K, Towbin JA, Marcus FI, Spevak PJ, Bluemke DA, Abraham T, Russell SD, Calkins H, Judge DP: Clinical features of arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy associated with mutations in plakophilin-2. Circulation. 2006, 113 (13): 1641-1649. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.568642.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- van Tintelen JP, Entius MM, Bhuiyan ZA, Jongbloed R, Wiesfeld AC, Wilde AA, van der Smagt J, Boven LG, Mannens MM, van Langen IM, Hofstra RM, Otterspoor LC, Doevendans PA, Rodriguez LM, van Gelder IC, Hauer RN: Plakophilin-2 mutations are the major determinant of familial arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 2006, 113 (13): 1650-1658. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.609719.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kannankeril PJ, Bhuiyan ZA, Darbar D, Mannens MM, Wilde AA, Roden DM: Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy due to a novel plakophilin 2 mutation: wide spectrum of disease in mutation carriers within a family. Heart Rhythm. 2006, 3 (8): 939-944. 10.1016/j.hrthm.2006.04.028.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Syrris P, Ward D, Asimaki A, Sen-Chowdhry S, Ebrahim HY, Evans A, Hitomi N, Norman M, Pantazis A, Shaw AL, Elliott PM, McKenna WJ: Clinical expression of plakophilin-2 mutations in familial arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 2006, 113 (3): 356-364. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.561654.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Corrado D, Thiene G: Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia: clinical impact of molecular genetic studies. Circulation. 2006, 113 (13): 1634-1637. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.616490.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Protonotarios N, Tsatsopoulou A, Anastasakis A, Sevdalis E, McKoy G, Stratos K, Gatzoulis K, Tentolouris K, Spiliopoulou C, Panagiotakos D, McKenna W, Toutouzas P: Genotype-phenotype assessment in autosomal recessive arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (Naxos disease) caused by a deletion in plakoglobin. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2001, 38 (5): 1477-1484. 10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01568-6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bauce B, Basso C, Rampazzo A, Beffagna G, Daliento L, Frigo G, Malacrida S, Settimo L, Danieli G, Thiene G, Nava A: Clinical profile of four families with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy caused by dominant desmoplakin mutations. Eur Heart J. 2005, 26 (16): 1666-1675. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi341.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Awad MM, Dalal D, Tichnell C, James C, Tucker A, Abraham T, Spevak PJ, Calkins H, Judge DP: Recessive arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia due to novel cryptic splice mutation in PKP2. Hum Mutat. 2006, 27 (11): 1157-10.1002/humu.9461.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Frances R, Rodriguez Benitez AM, Cohen DR: Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia and anterior polar cataract. Am J Med Genet. 1997, 73 (2): 125-126. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19971212)73:2<125::AID-AJMG4>3.0.CO;2-T.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Awad MM, Dalal D, Cho E, Amat-Alarcon N, James C, Tichnell C, Tucker A, Russell SD, Bluemke DA, Dietz HC, Calkins H, Judge DP: DSG2 mutations contribute to arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy. American journal of human genetics. 2006, 79 (1): 136-142. 10.1086/504393.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Djabali K, Martinez-Mir A, Horev L, Christiano AM, Zlotogorski A: Evidence for extensive locus heterogeneity in Naxos disease. J Invest Dermatol. 2002, 118 (3): 557-560. 10.1046/j.0022-202x.2001.01627.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sen-Chowdhry S, Syrris P, Ward D, Asimaki A, Sevdalis E, McKenna WJ: Clinical and genetic characterization of families with arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy provides novel insights into patterns of disease expression. Circulation. 2007, 115 (13): 1710-1720. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.660241.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sen-Chowdhry S, Syrris P, McKenna WJ: Genetics of right ventricular cardiomyopathy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005, 16 (8): 927-935. 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2005.40842.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ahmad F: The molecular genetics of arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia-cardiomyopathy. Clin Invest Med. 2003, 26 (4): 167-178.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Danieli GA, Rampazzo A: Genetics of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2002, 17 (3): 218-221. 10.1097/00001573-200205000-00002.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pilichou K, Nava A, Basso C, Beffagna G, Bauce B, Lorenzon A, Frigo G, Vettori A, Valente M, Towbin J, Thiene G, Danieli GA, Rampazzo A: Mutations in desmoglein-2 gene are associated with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 2006, 113 (9): 1171-1179. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.583674.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sen-Chowdhry S, Syrris P, McKenna WJ: Desmoplakin disease in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: early genotype-phenotype studies. Eur Heart J. 2005, 26 (16): 1582-1584. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi343.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nava A, Bauce B, Basso C, Muriago M, Rampazzo A, Villanova C, Daliento L, Buja G, Corrado D, Danieli GA, Thiene G: Clinical profile and long-term follow-up of 37 families with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2000, 36 (7): 2226-2233. 10.1016/S0735-1097(00)00997-9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hamid MS, Norman M, Quraishi A, Firoozi S, Thaman R, Gimeno JR, Sachdev B, Rowland E, Elliott PM, McKenna WJ: Prospective evaluation of relatives for familial arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia reveals a need to broaden diagnostic criteria. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2002, 40 (8): 1445-1450. 10.1016/S0735-1097(02)02307-0.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- van der Wall EE, Kayser HW, Bootsma MM, de Roos A, Schalij MJ: Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia: MRI findings. Herz. 2000, 25 (4): 356-364. 10.1007/s000590050028.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pennell D, Casolo G: Right ventricular arrhythmia: emergence of magnetic resonance imaging as an investigative tool. Eur Heart J. 1997, 18 (12): 1843-1845.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Naito H, Arisawa J, Harada K, Yamagami H, Kozuka T, Tamura S: Assessment of right ventricular regional contraction and comparison with the left ventricle in normal humans: a cine magnetic resonance study with presaturation myocardial tagging. Br Heart J. 1995, 74 (2): 186-191. 10.1136/hrt.74.2.186.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Prakasa KR, Dalal D, Wang J, Bomma C, Tandri H, Dong J, James C, Tichnell C, Russell SD, Spevak P, Corretti M, Bluemke DA, Calkins H, Abraham TP: Feasibility and variability of three dimensional echocardiography in arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy. The American journal of cardiology. 2006, 97 (5): 703-709. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.11.020.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Auffermann W, Wichter T, Breithardt G, Joachimsen K, Peters PE: Arrhythmogenic right ventricular disease: MR imaging vs angiography. Ajr. 1993, 161 (3): 549-555.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Midiri M, Finazzo M, Brancato M, Hoffmann E, Indovina G, Maria MD, Lagalla R: Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia: MR features. Eur Radiol. 1997, 7 (3): 307-312. 10.1007/s003300050155.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ricci C, Longo R, Pagnan L, Dalla Palma L, Pinamonti B, Camerini F, Bussani R, Silvestri F: Magnetic resonance imaging in right ventricular dysplasia. The American journal of cardiology. 1992, 70 (20): 1589-1595. 10.1016/0002-9149(92)90462-8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tandri H, Saranathan M, Rodriguez ER, Martinez C, Bomma C, Nasir K, Rosen B, Lima JA, Calkins H, Bluemke DA: Noninvasive detection of myocardial fibrosis in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy using delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2005, 45 (1): 98-103. 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.09.053.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tandri H, Bomma C, Calkins H, Bluemke DA: Magnetic resonance and computed tomography imaging of arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004, 19 (6): 848-858. 10.1002/jmri.20078.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tandri H, Calkins H, Nasir K, Bomma C, Castillo E, Rutberg J, Tichnell C, Lima JA, Bluemke DA: Magnetic resonance imaging findings in patients meeting task force criteria for arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2003, 14 (5): 476-482. 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2003.02560.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tandri H, Castillo E, Ferrari VA, Nasir K, Dalal D, Bomma C, Calkins H, Bluemke DA: Magnetic resonance imaging of arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia: sensitivity, specificity, and observer variability of fat detection versus functional analysis of the right ventricle. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2006, 48 (11): 2277-2284. 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.07.051.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bluemke DA, Krupinski EA, Ovitt T, Gear K, Unger E, Axel L, Boxt LM, Casolo G, Ferrari VA, Funaki B, Globits S, Higgins CB, Julsrud P, Lipton M, Mawson J, Nygren A, Pennell DJ, Stillman A, White RD, Wichter T, Marcus F: MR Imaging of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: morphologic findings and interobserver reliability. Cardiology. 2003, 99 (3): 153-162. 10.1159/000070672.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bloomer TN, Plein S, Radjenovic A, Higgins DM, Jones TR, Ridgway JP, Sivananthan MU: Cine MRI using steady state free precession in the radial long axis orientation is a fast accurate method for obtaining volumetric data of the left ventricle. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001, 14 (6): 685-692. 10.1002/jmri.10019.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schick F, Miller S, Hahn U, Nagele T, Helber U, Stauder N, Brechtel K, Claussen CD: Fat- and water-selective MR cine imaging of the human heart: assessment of right ventricular dysplasia. Invest Radiol. 2000, 35 (5): 311-318. 10.1097/00004424-200005000-00005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Arai AE, Epstein FH, Bove KE, Wolff SD: Visualization of aortic valve leaflets using black blood MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999, 10 (5): 771-777. 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2586(199911)10:5<771::AID-JMRI22>3.0.CO;2-Q.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fayad ZA, Fuster V, Fallon JT, Jayasundera T, Worthley SG, Helft G, Aguinaldo JG, Badimon JJ, Sharma SK: Noninvasive in vivo human coronary artery lumen and wall imaging using black-blood magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation. 2000, 102 (5): 506-510.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stuber M, Botnar RM, Kissinger KV, Manning WJ: Free-breathing black-blood coronary MR angiography: initial results. Radiology. 2001, 219 (1): 278-283.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Castillo E, Tandri H, Rodriguez ER, Nasir K, Rutberg J, Calkins H, Lima JA, Bluemke DA: Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia: ex vivo and in vivo fat detection with black-blood MR imaging. Radiology. 2004, 232 (1): 38-48. 10.1148/radiol.2321030688.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Menghetti L, Basso C, Nava A, Angelini A, Thiene G: Spin-echo nuclear magnetic resonance for tissue characterisation in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. Heart. 1996, 76 (6): 467-470. 10.1136/hrt.76.6.467.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Abbara S, Migrino RQ, Sosnovik DE, Leichter JA, Brady TJ, Holmvang G: Value of fat suppression in the MRI evaluation of suspected arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia. Ajr. 2004, 182 (3): 587-591.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Imada M, Funabashi N, Asano M, Uehara M, Hori Y, Ueda M, Komuro I: Epidemiology of fat replacement of the right ventricular myocardium determined by multislice computed tomography using a logistic regression model. Int J Cardiol. 2007, 119 (3): 410-413. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2006.07.174.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Macedo R, Prakasa K, Tichnell C, Marcus F, Calkins H, Lima JA, Bluemke DA: Marked lipomatous infiltration of the right ventricle: MRI findings in relation to arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia. Ajr. 2007, 188 (5): W423-7. 10.2214/AJR.06.0161.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Harper KW, Tello R: Prediction rule for diagnosis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia based on wall thickness measured on MR imaging. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2003, 27 (5): 363-371. 10.1016/S0895-6111(03)00014-4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hunold P, Wieneke H, Bruder O, Krueger U, Schlosser T, Erbel R, Barkhausen J: Late enhancement: a new feature in MRI of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy?. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2005, 7 (4): 649-655.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Burke AP, Farb A, Tashko G, Virmani R: Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy and fatty replacement of the right ventricular myocardium: are they different diseases?. Circulation. 1998, 97 (16): 1571-1580.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sen-Chowdhry S, Prasad SK, Syrris P, Wage R, Ward D, Merrifield R, Smith GC, Firmin DN, Pennell DJ, McKenna WJ: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy revisited: comparison with task force criteria and genotype. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2006, 48 (10): 2132-2140. 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.07.045.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bomma C, Dalal D, Tandri H, Prakasa K, Nasir K, Roguin A, Tichnell C, James C, Lima JA, Calkins H, Bluemke DA: Regional differences in systolic and diastolic function in arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy using magnetic resonance imaging. The American journal of cardiology. 2005, 95 (12): 1507-1511. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.02.026.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fayad ZA, Ferrari VA, Kraitchman DL, Young AA, Palevsky HI, Bloomgarden DC, Axel L: Right ventricular regional function using MR tagging: normals versus chronic pulmonary hypertension. Magn Reson Med. 1998, 39 (1): 116-123. 10.1002/mrm.1910390118.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Appleton CP, Hatle LK, Popp RL: Relation of transmitral flow velocity patterns to left ventricular diastolic function: new insights from a combined hemodynamic and Doppler echocardiographic study. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 1988, 12 (2): 426-440.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Roguin A, Bomma CS, Nasir K, Tandri H, Tichnell C, James C, Rutberg J, Crosson J, Spevak PJ, Berger RD, Halperin HR, Calkins H: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2004, 43 (10): 1843-1852. 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.01.030.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bomma C, Rutberg J, Tandri H, Nasir K, Roguin A, Tichnell C, Rodriguez R, James C, Kasper E, Spevak P, Bluemke DA, Calkins H: Misdiagnosis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2004, 15 (3): 300-306.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Corrado D, Fontaine G, Marcus FI, McKenna WJ, Nava A, Thiene G, Wichter T: Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy: need for an international registry. European Society of Cardiology and the Scientific Council on Cardiomyopathies of the World Heart Federation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2000, 11 (7): 827-832. 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2000.tb00059.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marcus F, Towbin JA, Zareba W, Moss A, Calkins H, Brown M, Gear K: Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C): a multidisciplinary study: design and protocol. Circulation. 2003, 107 (23): 2975-2978. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000071380.43086.29.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Corrado D, Basso C, Thiene G, McKenna WJ, Davies MJ, Fontaliran F, Nava A, Silvestri F, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Wlodarska EK, Fontaine G, Camerini F: Spectrum of clinicopathologic manifestations of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia: a multicenter study. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 1997, 30 (6): 1512-1520. 10.1016/S0735-1097(97)00332-X.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hebert JL, Chemla D, Gerard O, Zamani K, Quillard J, Azarine A, Frank R, Lecarpentier Y, Fontaine G: Angiographic right and left ventricular function in arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia. The American journal of cardiology. 2004, 93 (6): 728-733. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2003.11.055.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Peters S, Reil GH: Risk factors of cardiac arrest in arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia. Eur Heart J. 1995, 16 (1): 77-80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lindstrom L, Nylander E, Larsson H, Wranne B: Left ventricular involvement in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy - a scintigraphic and echocardiographic study. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2005, 25 (3): 171-177. 10.1111/j.1475-097X.2005.00607.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Manyari DE, Klein GJ, Gulamhusein S, Boughner D, Guiraudon GM, Wyse G, Mitchell LB, Kostuk WJ: Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia: a generalized cardiomyopathy?. Circulation. 1983, 68 (2): 251-257.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gallo P, d'Amati G, Pelliccia F: Pathologic evidence of extensive left ventricular involvement in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. Hum Pathol. 1992, 23 (8): 948-952. 10.1016/0046-8177(92)90410-5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pinamonti B, Sinagra G, Salvi A, Di Lenarda A, Morgera T, Silvestri F, Bussani R, Camerini F: Left ventricular involvement in right ventricular dysplasia. Am Heart J. 1992, 123 (3): 711-724. 10.1016/0002-8703(92)90511-S.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kamide K, Satoh S, Okamoto K, Ueda T, Katoh H, Nakano S, Katoh O, Kobayashi T, Matsuda H, Shibata N: A case of arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia with left and right ventricular hypofunction in an elderly subject--long-term follow-up. Jpn Circ J. 1997, 61 (10): 872-876. 10.1253/jcj.61.872.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Horimoto M, Funayama N, Satoh M, Igarashi T, Sekiguchi M: Histological evidence of left ventricular involvement in arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia. Jpn Circ J. 1989, 53 (12): 1530-1534.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Higuchi S, Caglar NM, Shimada R, Yamada A, Takeshita A, Nakamura M: 16-year follow-up of arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia. Am Heart J. 1984, 108 (5): 1363-1365. 10.1016/0002-8703(84)90769-5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.