Volume 13 Supplement 1
A protocol for the measurement of myocardial blood volume and water exchange
© Biris et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Published: 2 February 2011
Absolute myocardial perfusion MR imaging (ml/min/100g tissue) has the potential to timely diagnose and reduce patient mortality from coronary artery disease.
Organ perfusion can be quantified by direct calibration of relative perfusion images using absolute blood volume (ml/100g) . It is well known that for an intravascular gadolinium-based T1 shortening contrast agent, the parenchymal T1 change reflects tissue blood volume .However, to accurately quantify blood flow from blood volume, we must describe the compartmentalization effects of intra- to extra-vascular water exchange [2, 3].
Materials and methods
In an instrumented dog we measured T1 using a cardiac gated Modified Look Locker Inversion Recovery (MOLLI)(4) pulse sequence (slice thickness 8 mm, FOV 171 x 343 mm2, matrix 96 x192, TR 173 ms, effective TI 100 ms ). Images were acquired on a 1.5 T Espree scanner (Siemens Medical Systems, Erlangen, Germany), during a short breath-hold, 5 minutes after injections of 0.003 mmol/kg of MS-325 (Ablavar, Lantheus Medical Imaging, Billerica, MA).
We estimated the myocardium and left ventricle blood pool T1 through fitting of MOLLI signal to the regrowth curves of the Look-Locker equation by an automatic image processing program developed in MATLAB R2009a (Mathworks, Natick, MA, USA).Myocardial blood volume (MBV) was calculated from the baseline to post-contrast change in T1 in the blood pool and myocardium.
Blood pool and myocardium T1
T1 in left ventricle blood pool (ms)
T1 in myocardium (ms)
We have established an imaging protocol to measure MBV and water exchange. Over-estimation of MBV may be caused by extravasation of MS-325, and to a lesser extent by T2 bias on the T1 measurements with the steady-state free precession MOLLI sequence. Future steps include measuring MBV with a strictly intravascular USPIO contrast agent, application of a more sophisticated fit that includes T2 effects, and determination of the water exchange constant by Monte-Carlo simulations.
- Carroll TJ, Horowitz S, et al: Magn Reson Imaging. 2008, 26 (10): 1352-9. 10.1016/j.mri.2008.04.010.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Donahue KM, Weisskoff RM, et al: Magn Reson Med. 1996, 36 (6): 858-67. 10.1002/mrm.1910360608.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hazlewood CF, Chang DC, et al: Biophys J. 1974, 14 (8): 583-606. 10.1016/S0006-3495(74)85937-0.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Messroghli DR, Radjenovic A, et al: Magn Reson Med. 2004, 52 (1): 141-6. 10.1002/mrm.20110.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bjornerud A, Bjerner T, et al: Magn Reson Med. 2003, 49 (5): 828-37. 10.1002/mrm.10430.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.