Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison of diagnostic performance of non-contrast 1.5 T WHCA and contrast-enhanced 3.0 T WHCA for the detection of significant CAD

From: Diagnostic accuracy of whole heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis

 

Non-contrast 1.5 T WHCA (N = 20 studies)

Contrast-enhanced 3.0 T WHCA (N = 9 studies)

P-value

Patient-based analysis

 Sensitivity

0.86 (0.80–0.90)

0.92 (0.87–0.96)

0.07

 Specificity

0.74 (0.64–0.82)

0.87 (0.80–0.92)

0.02

 AUC

0.88

0.94

N/A

Vessel-based analysis

 Sensitivity

0.84 (0.77–0.90)

0.91 (0.86–0.94)

0.07

 Specificity

0.86 (0.77–0.92)

0.91 (0.89–0.93)

0.20

 AUC

0.91

0.95

N/A

Segment-based analysis

 Sensitivity

0.82 (0.75–0.88)

0.88 (0.85–0.91)

0.1

 Specificity

0.93 (0.88–0.95)

0.95 (0.94–0.96)

0.28

 AUC

0.93

0.95

N/A

  1. Data are weighted mean ± 95% confidence interval
  2. AUC area under the curve, CAD coronary artery disease, WHCA whole heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography