Skip to main content

Table 4 Differences of the T1 and T2 mapping results for the travelling volunteers between sites I, II and III

From: Multi-site comparison of parametric T1 and T2 mapping: healthy travelling volunteers in the Berlin research network for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (BER-CMR)

Parameter

Site I vs. site II

Site I vs. site III

Site II vs. site III

T1 global (ms/%)

1.4 [− 3.2;6.1] / 0.1 [− 0.9; 1]

− 15.8 [− 20.5; -11.5)] / 1.2 [0.2; 2.1]

− 15.7 [− 21.0; − 10.4)]/ 1.1 [− 0.1; 2.3]

T1 basal (ms/%)

− 0.6 [− 8.5; 7.2] / 0.1 [− 1.0; 1.2]

− 15.9 [− 22.9; − 8.9)] / 1 [− 0.1; 2.0]

− 14.3 [− 23.3; − 5.4)] / 1.1 [− 0.4; 2.6]

T1 midventricular (ms/%)

0.1 [− 6.7; 6.9] / 0.3 [− 0.7; 1.3]

− 16.3 [− 22.8; − 9.7] / 1.5[0.5; 2.4]

− 14.8 [− 22.5; − 7.2] /1.1 [0.1; 2.1]

T1 apical (ms/%)

7.2 [− 2.5; 16.9] / − 0.3 [− 1.3; 0.7]

− 14.7 [− 24.4; 5.1)] / 1.1 [0.01; 2.2]

− 19.1 [− 30.7; − 7.4)]/ 1.3 [− 0.2; 2.8]

T2 global (ms/%)

− 0.4 [− 0.7; 0.0] / 0.8 [− 1.3; 2.9]

1.1 [0.2; 2.0] / 0.0 [− 2.3–2.3]

0.6 [− 0.2; 0.9] / − 1.3 [− 2.8; 0.2]

T2 basal (ms/%)

− 0.4 [− 0.9; 0.2] / 0.9 [− 1.1; 3.0]

0.3 [− 0.7; 1.3] / 0.3 [− 2.2; 2.7]

0.2 [− 0.4; 0.7] / − 0.6 [− 2.6; 1.5]

T2 midventricular (ms/%)

0.0 [− 0.6; 0.5] / 0.05 [− 2.3; 2.4]

1.1 [− 0.5; 2.7] / 0.1 [− 2.3; 2.6]

− 0.4 [− 1.3; 0.5] − 0.7 [− 2.8; 1.4]

T2 apical (ms/%)

− 0.9 [− 1.8; 0.0] / 2.1 [− 1.0; 5.3]

2.2 [− 0.1; 4.5] / − 0.8 [− 4.2; 2.7]

1.8 [0.5; 3.2] / − 3.4 [− 5.5; − 1.4]

  1. Data presented for differences between sites as absolute and percent numbers (95% confidence interval in square brackets)