Skip to main content

Table 2 Corrected resting, hyperaemic myocardial blood flow (MBF), and corrected myocardial perfusion reserve index (MPRI) classified by QCA segmental grading.

From: 2011 Quantitative cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion imaging at 3 Tesla in patients with suspected coronary artery disease

 

Sensitivity

Specificity

AUC ± SE

Diagnostic accuracy

Overall detection of CAD

Visual

92% (24/26)

79% (11/14)

0.85 ± 0.06*

88% (35/40)

Quantitative

96% (25/26)

71% (10/14)

0.84 ± 0.06*

88% (35/40)

Single-vessel Disease

Visual

75% (9/12)

86% (24/28)

0.80 ± 0.08

83% (33/40)

Quantitative

58% (7/12)

96% (27/28)

0.77 ± 0.09

85% (34/40)

Multi-vessel Disease

Visual

71%(10/14)

85% (22/26)

0.78 ± 0.08

80% (32/40)

Quantitative

93% (13/14)

69% (18/26)

0.81 ± 0.08

78% (31/40)

Left Anterior Descending Artery

Visual

81% (13/16)

83% (20/24)

0.82 ± 0.07*

83% (33/40)

Quantitative

94% (15/16)

67% (16/24)

0.80 ± 0.08*

78% (31/40)

Left Circumflex Artery

Visual

57% (8/14)

88% (23/26)

0.73 ± 0.09*

78% (31/40)

Quantitative

100% (14/14)

77% (20/26)

0.89 ± 0.06*

85% (34/40)

Right Coronary Artery

Visual

83% (15/18)

82% (18/22)

0.83 ± 0.07*

83% (33/40)

Quantitative

100% (18/18)

64% (14/22)

0.82 ± 0.07*

80% (32/40)

  1. AUC = Area Under the ROC Curve; SE = Standard Error; *p > 0.05 for comparison of AUC with the 2 methods of assessment.