Skip to main content
Figure 2 | Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Figure 2

From: Comparison of wall thickening and ejection fraction by cardiovascular magnetic resonance and echocardiography in acute myocardial infarction

Figure 2

Improvement of EF echo and EF CMR at 4-month follow-up. Figure 2 shows the EF (ejection fraction) for echocardiography (51.2 ± 8.1%) and CMR (44.2 ± 11.6%, at baseline (EF echo 1, EF CMR 1) and follow-up (EF echo 2, EF CMR 2) (54.5 ± 8.3%, and 49.2 ± 11%, respectively) and visualises the statistically highly significant (p < 0.001) improvement at 4-month follow-up. (* p < 0.001, + p < 0.01). Data is presented as mean ± standard error and median.

Back to article page