Skip to main content

Table 3 Lipid profile changes in the ITT population.

From: Effect of rosiglitazone on progression of atherosclerosis: insights using 3D carotid cardiovascular magnetic resonance

Lipid parameter

 

Rosiglitazone

Placebo

(mmol/L)

 

(N = 25)

(N = 29)

Total Cholesterol

   

Baseline

geometric mean

4.14

4.36

 

(-SE, +SE)

3.97, 4.33

4.15, 4.58

End of treatment

geometric mean

4.13

4.17

 

(-SE, +SE)

3.97, 4.29

3.97, 4.37

% Change

geometric mean

-0.5

-4.5

 

(-SE, +SE)

-3.24, 2.40

-8.00, -0.85

P value

 

0.42

 

HDLc

   

Baseline

geometric mean

1.10

1.14

 

(-SE, +SE)

1.04, 1.15

1.06, 1.22

End of treatment

geometric mean

1.16

1.22

 

(-SE, +SE)

1.09, 1.22

1.15, 1.29

% Change

geometric mean

5.4

7.2

 

(-SE, +SE)

1.41, 9.55

3.35, 11.1

P value

 

0.97

 

LDLc

   

Baseline

geometric mean

2.22

2.31

 

(-SE, +SE)

2.07, 2.37

2.16, 2.47

End of treatment

geometric mean

2.23

2.13

 

(-SE, +SE)

2.10, 2.36

1.98, 2.28

% Change

geometric mean

0.4

-7.9

 

(-SE, +SE)

-4.07, 5.10

-12.7, -2.82

P value

 

0.24

 

Triglycerides

   

Baseline

geometric mean

1.61

1.67

 

(-SE, +SE)

1.50, 1.72

1.52, 1.84

End of treatment

geometric mean

1.35

1.48

 

(-SE, +SE)

1.24, 1.47

1.36, 1.61

% Change

geometric mean

-16.0

-11.6

 

(-SE, +SE)

-22.4, -9.13

-18.1, -4.65

P value

 

0.70

 

Free fatty acids

   

Baseline

geometric mean

0.58

0.56

 

(-SE, +SE)

0.55, 0.62

0.53, 0.59

End of treatment

geometric mean

0.46

0.60

 

(-SE, +SE)

0.42, 0.50

0.57, 0.64

% Change

geometric mean

-20.7

7.8

 

(-SE, +SE)

-28.00, -12.6

2.86, 12.9

P value

 

0.0050

 
  1. There were no significant between groups differences
  2. % Change based on log-transformed data: 100* [exp (mean change on log scale) – 1].