Skip to main content

Table 1 Evolution of tagging pulse sequences

From: Myocardial tagging by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: evolution of techniques–pulse sequences, analysis algorithms, and applications

Technique

Inventor (Ref#)

Year

Advantages

Disadvantages

Magnetization Saturation

Zerhouni (20)

1988

Simple idea; first tagging technique.

Low resolution; long scan time; high SAR.

SPAMM

Axel (21)

1989

Low SAR; available for clinical applications.

Moderate resolution; 2-D only; tag fading.

Cine SPAMM

McVeigh (46)

1992

Cine capability.

Multiple breath-holds.

Localized SPAMM

Chandra (49)

Ikonomidou (51)

1996

2002

Tagging confined to region of interest.

Complicated tag preparation.

Variable-density SPAMM

McVeigh (50)

Ikonomidou (52)

1998

2003

Sensitive motion estimation.

Long tag preparation time.

Radial tagging

Bolster (54)

Bosmans (55)

1990

1990

Suitable for measuring radial strain & heart rotation.

Low resolution for measuring circumferential strain.

Ring tagging

Spiegel (28)

2003

Suitable for measuring circumferential strain.

Low resolution for measuring radial strain.

DANTE

Mosher (22)

1990

High-density pattern of thin tags.

Long tag preparation time.

CSPAMM

Fischer (23)

1993

Improved tagging contrast; no tag fading.

Double scan time as SPAMM.

Slice-following (sf) CSPAMM

Fischer (69)

1994

Tracks tissue through-plane motion.

Lower SNR than CSPAMM.

Single breath-hold sf CSPAMM

Stuber (77)

1999

Fast data acquisition; high temporal resolution.

EPI may cause motion artifacts.

HARP

Osman (24)

1999

Fast tag analysis.

Phase errors; low SNR.

Real-time HARP

Sampath (163)

2003

High temporal resolution.

Complicated setup.

3D-HARP

Pan (166)

2005

3D strain analysis.

Long tag analysis time.

zHARP

Abd-Elmoniem (167)

2005

3D tissue tracking; short scan time.

Complicated data analysis.

fastHARP

Abd-Elmoniem (164)

2007

Short data acquisition time; 25 frames/s.

Complicated setup.

DENSE

Aletras (25)

1999

High spatial resolution; black-blood

Low SNR.

fast-DENSE

Aletras (187)

1999

Single breath-hold.

EPI artifacts.

meta-DENSE

Aletras (181)

2001

higher SNR.

Longer acquisition time.

DENSE with CANSEL

Epstein (184)

2004

higher SNR; less artifacts.

Long scan time.

SENC

Osman (26)

2001

High resolution; simple processing; intuitive view.

Low SNR.

sf-SENC

Fahmy (208)

2006

Through-plane tracking.

Low SNR.

fast-SENC

Pan (209)

2006

Real-time imaging.

Low resolution.

sf-fast-SENC

Ibrahim (210)

2007

Real-time imaging with tissue tracking.

Low resolution & SNR.

C-SENC

Ibrahim (211)

2008

Both strain & viability information in one scan.

No cine capability.