Skip to main content
Figure 2 | Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Figure 2

From: Adiabatic T2-preparation modules optimized for robustness toward cardiac motion and flow - a comparison with existing techniques at 3 Tesla

Figure 2

Figure 2a) Both NTs have a statistically significantly better quality score (homogeneity, endocardial border definition, flow artifacts) compared to MLEV4 and mBIR4: *p<0.05 cs MLEV4: #p<0.05 vs mBIR4 (score: 0 poor, 1 equivocal, 2 satisfactory, 3 excellent). Figure 2b) Note the decreased inhomogeneity (i.e. improved homogeneity) of both NTs in myocardium and vavity compared to MLEV4. Also see the drastically increased inhomogeneity of mBIR4 in the cavity.

Back to article page

Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

ISSN: 1532-429X

Contact us