Skip to main content
Figure 36 | Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Figure 36

From: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance physics for clinicians: part II

Figure 36

This figure illustrates some of the common pitfalls encountered with velocity-encoded MR imaging. Images (a) and (b) show a transaxial magnitude image and velocity map with ‘through-plane’ velocity encoding demonstrating forward flow in the ascending aorta (arrows). In (b), the maximum velocity is within the VENC chosen for the velocity-encoded acquisition, so that the phase shifts for all the pixels within the ascending aorta are less than 180° and are shown as high pixel intensities. In image (c), the VENC is set too low and the pixels at the centre of the ascending aorta (arrow) appear as negative velocities. This artefact, known as ‘velocity aliasing’ arises because phase shifts greater than 180° are interpreted as negative phase shifts and are mapped on to the lower pixel intensity scale (d). Images (e) and (f) show a magnitude image and velocity map acquired in an oblique sagittal plane to demonstrate flow in the aortic arch. The velocity encoding direction is chosen as ‘in-plane’ to demonstrate velocity components in the head-feet direction. In (f), the maximum velocity in both the ascending and descending aorta is lower than the VENC so that no aliasing is visible. For image (g) the VENC has been set too low resulting in velocity aliasing. For image (h) the velocity encoding direction has been incorrectly chosen to encode velocity components through the image plane, so that only relatively low transverse components of blood flow velocity are visible in the aorta.

Back to article page