Skip to main content

Table 1

From: Diastolic function imaging: a comparison of real-time phase contrast magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging with segmented phase contrast CMR and Doppler echocardiography

 

Concordance Correlation

Bland-Altman Analysis (Bias ± LOA)cm/s

RT-PC CMR vs Echo E

0.41

2.5 ± 26.4

RT-PC CMR vs Echo A

0.38

2.0 ± 24.7

RT-PC CMR vs. Echo E/A ratio

0.42

0.1 ± 1.8

RT-PC CMR vs Segmented E

0.56

3.9 ± 21.4

RT-PC CMR vs Segmented A

0.38

2.1 ± 24.4

RT-PC CMR vs Segmented E/A

0.42

-0.1 ± 1.6

Segmented PC CMR vs echo E

0.62

-1.4 ± 17.3

Segmented PC CMR vs echo A

0.72

-0.1 ± 13.9

Segmented PC CMR vs echo E/A

0.67

0.0 ± 1.2

  1. CMR, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging; RT-PC, Real-time phase contrast CMR; echo, echocardiography; LOA, level of agreement; 2SD, 2 standard deviations