Skip to main content

Table 3 ICA-based R-peak detection results for the training and test datasets using different lead configurations

From: ECG-based gating in ultra high field cardiovascular magnetic resonance using an independent component analysis approach

 

Configuration

Training dataset

Test dataset

LC

# leads

# PCs

Leads I, II +

Se [%]

+P [%]

μpd [ms]

σpd [ms]

Se [%]

+P [%]

μpd [ms]

σpd [ms]

1

8

8

V1-V6

99.5

99.4

3.5

6.6

99.2

99.1

5.8

5.0

2a

7

6

V2-V6

99.2

99.1

5.9

9.6

98.9

99

12.1

8.2

2b

6

6

V1-V4

99.2

99.3

4.5

5.6

99.4

98.3

11.7

13.3

2c

5

4

V2-V4

99.2

99.2

4.5

10.3

98.7

97

14.5

13.6

2d

4

4

V3-V4

98.9

98.5

4.5

6.9

98.3

97.7

16.9

13.4

2e

3

3

V2

94.7

94.5

12.2

10.5

95.2

93.7

12.1

15.9

2f

3

3

V3

97.3

92.8

11.7

8.5

96.5

92.4

14.5

9.7

2g

3

3

V4

98.2

97.3

6.3

11.5

98.5

97.2

13.9

12.2

2h

2

2

–

77.1

66.3

33.3

20.6

78.9

65.8

22.1

11.2

  1. R-peak detection results for the training and test datasets using the ICA-based method with lead configurations LC2a-LC2g. Averaged results of lead configuration LC1 are shown for comparison (μpd: mean detection delay; σpd: jitter).