Figure 4

T2 Values. T2 values from remote and affected myocardial regions are shown for the sham and the NSTE-ACS model groups. The T2 difference (affected – remote) was significantly larger in the model group than in the sham group (9.6 ± 4.2 ms vs. 5.1 ± 1.2 ms, p = 0.02). Asterisks indicate outlier values from one sham dog.