Skip to main content

Table 1 Image quality comparison between breath-hold and free-breathing cine images.

From: Compressed sensing with synchronized cardio-respiratory sparsity for free-breathing cine MRI: initial comparative study on patients with arrhythmias

Technique

Group 1

Group 2

BH

3.75 ± 0.46

2.0 ± 0.93

FB

3.0 ± 0.53

3.1 ± 0.74

  1. Group 1 included patients with normal sinus rhythm and group 2 included patients with arrhythmias or impaired breath-hold capability.
Back to article page

Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

ISSN: 1532-429X

Contact us