Skip to main content

Table 1 Associations between patient characteristics, angiography data and CMR data with invasive reference standards of epicardial artery disease (IVUS plaque volumes index; 1) and microvascular disease (IMR; 2).

From: Multiparametric cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of cardiac allograft vasculopathy

1. Associations with coronary intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) plaque volume index

Univariable associations

A. Patient characteristics

β

p value

 

Time since transplantation

0.49

0.001

 

Donor age

0.29

0.058

 

B. Angiography data

  
 

Maximum angiographic stenosis

0.33

0.024

 

C. CMR data

  
 

Early diastolic SR

-0.38

0.014

 

MPR

-0.55

< 0.001

 

Infarct LGE

0.35

0.022

Multivariable stepwise regression

A. Including patient characteristics and angiographic data

  
 

Time since transplantation

0.49

0.001

 

B. Including patient characteristics and CMR data

  
 

Time since transplantation

0.47

< 0.001

 

Early diastolic SR

-0.24

0.049

 

MPR

-0.57

< 0.001

2. Associations with index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR)

Univariable associations

A. Patient characteristics

  
 

Donor age

0.39

0.007

 

Donor hypertension

0.35

0.016

 

B. Angiography data

  
 

Maximum angiographic stenosis

-0.16

0.281

 

C. CMR data

  
 

LVEF

-0.36

0.015

 

εcc

0.46

0.002

 

MPR

-0.55

< 0.001

Multivariable stepwise regression

Donor hypertension

0.29

0.012

 

EF

-0.26

0.024

 

MPR

-0.60

< 0.001

  1. Only selected data is shown due to table size constraints. 1. On univariable analysis, maximum angiographic stenosis showed a significant association with plaque volume index, however after correcting for time since transplantation, this relationship was no longer significant. Early diastolic strain rate (SR), myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) and infarct late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) were significantly associated with plaque volume index on univariable analyses, but only MPR and early diastolic SR remained independently associated with plaque volume index on multivariable analysis. 2. Maximum angiographic stenosis was not significantly associated with IMR on univariable analysis. Patient characteristics including donor age and donor hypertension showed significant associations with IMR on univariable analyses, as did CMR parameters such as LV ejection fraction (EF), peak systolic circumferential strain (εcc) and MPR. On multivariable analysis only donor hypertension, EF and MPR remained independently associated with IMR.