Figure 2
(a) shows the T1 estimation error at different heart-rates by both methods in phantom studies. Compared with the standard MOLLI approach, InSiL shows better T1 estimation accuracy and is less dependent on heart-rate. (b) shows the Bland-Altman plot of both methods in selected ROIs of myocardial, skeletal muscle, liver and blood at In vivo. InSiL produces larger T1 values compared with the MOLLI, especially for longer T1s, which correlates well with phantom results.