Skip to main content

Table 1 Afterload Indices Versus EF, Strain and Strain Rate

From: Afterload quantitation for evaluation of myocardial strain

  n Spearman r p
CWS vs EF NL 39 -0.29 ns
PV/M vs EF NL 39 -0.59 < 0.0001
CWS vs EF CM 35 -0.40 < 0.02
PV/M vs EF CM 35 -0.63 < 0.0001
CWS vs CST NL 39 -0.28 ns
PV/M vs CST NL 39 -0.46 < 0.003
CWS vs CST CM 35 -0.18 ns
PV/M vs CST CM 35 -0.49 < 0.003
CWS vs SR NL 39 -0.28 ns
PV/M vs SR NL 39 -0.40 0.012
CWS vs SR CM 35 -0.19 ns
PV/M vs SR CM 35 -0.51 < 0.002