Skip to main content

Table 1 Global strain measurements for the different software (mean ± standard deviation %), grey cells showed there was a significant difference (p < 0.05) between that results and CIMTag measurements.

From: A comparison of cardiac motion analysis software packages: application to left ventricular deformation analysis in healthy subjects

   Tagging Feature Tracking Feature Tracking
Parameters Parameters CIMTag CVI42 Tomtec
Circumferential Strain SAX-basal -17.55 ± 1.40 -16.36 ± 3.87 -15.63 ± 3.26
Circumferential Strain SAX-mid -18.26 ± 3.63 -14.11 ± 1.95 -14.35 ± 2.64
Circumferential Strain SAX-apical -20.65 ± 2.79 -14.75 ± 2.59 -17.47 ± 4.29
Radial Strain SAX-basal 38.94 ± 26.74 29.75 ± 19.61 34.39 ± 10.68
Radial Strain SAX-mid 27.81 ± 9.95 21.67 ± 4.15 38.55 ± 11.76
Radial Strain SAX-apical 23.09 ± 10.52 24.67 ± 5.59 30.10 ± 13.41
Radial Strain 2-chamber 24.77 ± 12.58 30.72 ± 6.05 34.00 ± 10.96
Radial Strain 4-chamber 20.44 ± 15.46 35.15 ± 7.07 28.88 ± 7.21
Longitudinal Strain 2-chamber -14.25 ± 2.33 -16.27 ± 2.05 -15.83 ± 3.88
Longitudinal Strain 4-chamber -14.56 ± 2.20 -17.03 ± 1.97 -16.49 ± 3.74