Table 1 Global strain measurements for the different software (mean ± standard deviation %), grey cells showed there was a significant difference (p < 0.05) between that results and CIMTag measurements.
| Â | Â | Tagging | Feature Tracking | Feature Tracking |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Parameters | Parameters | CIMTag | CVI42 | Tomtec |
Circumferential Strain | SAX-basal | -17.55 ± 1.40 | -16.36 ± 3.87 | -15.63 ± 3.26 |
Circumferential Strain | SAX-mid | -18.26 ± 3.63 | -14.11 ± 1.95 | -14.35 ± 2.64 |
Circumferential Strain | SAX-apical | -20.65 ± 2.79 | -14.75 ± 2.59 | -17.47 ± 4.29 |
Radial Strain | SAX-basal | 38.94 ± 26.74 | 29.75 ± 19.61 | 34.39 ± 10.68 |
Radial Strain | SAX-mid | 27.81 ± 9.95 | 21.67 ± 4.15 | 38.55 ± 11.76 |
Radial Strain | SAX-apical | 23.09 ± 10.52 | 24.67 ± 5.59 | 30.10 ± 13.41 |
Radial Strain | 2-chamber | 24.77 ± 12.58 | 30.72 ± 6.05 | 34.00 ± 10.96 |
Radial Strain | 4-chamber | 20.44 ± 15.46 | 35.15 ± 7.07 | 28.88 ± 7.21 |
Longitudinal Strain | 2-chamber | -14.25 ± 2.33 | -16.27 ± 2.05 | -15.83 ± 3.88 |
Longitudinal Strain | 4-chamber | -14.56 ± 2.20 | -17.03 ± 1.97 | -16.49 ± 3.74 |