Table 1 Qualitative and quantitative analysis results for the comparison among DANTE-SPACE, SPACE, MPRAGE, and CE-MRV
|  | Score (mean ± std) | Number of thrombosed segment | SE (%) | SP (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) | ACC (%) | Diagnostic agreement (κ value / p) | Interobserver agreement (κ value / p) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DANTE-SPACE (reader1)/(reader2) | (3.60 ± 0.61)/(3.70 ± 0.46) | 22 / 19 | 90.9 / 94.4 | 97.8 / 97.9 | 90.9 / 89.5 | 97.8 / 98.9 | 96.4 / 97.3 | (0.89 / < 0.01) / (0.90 / < 0.01) | 0.73 / <0 .01 |
SPACE (reader1)/(reader2) | (3.22 ± 0.88)/ (2.72 ± 1.02) | 20 / 20 | 86.4 / 83.3 | 94.4 / 98.9 | 78.3 / 92.9 | 95.5 / 94.9 | 92.0 / 94.6 | (0.88 /< 0.01) / (0.75 / < 0.01) | 0.63 / <0.01 |
MPRAGE (reader1)/(reader2) | (1.94 ± 0.79)/ (2.61 ± 0.90) | 23 / 14 | 81.8 / 72.2 | 98.8 / 94.7 | 95.0 / 75.0 | 96.7 / 96.7 | 96.4 / 92.9 | (0.75 / < 0.01) / (0.78 / < 0.01) | 0.71 / <0.01 |
CE-MRV (reader1)/(reader2) | (3.81 ± 0.42)/ (3.82 ± 0.41) | 22 / 18 | ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- | 0.81 / <0.01 |