Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of differences between methods (M inc P&T and M ex P&T) in control and Fabry subjects

From: A disproportionate contribution of papillary muscles and trabeculations to total left ventricular mass makes choice of cardiovascular magnetic resonance analysis technique critical in Fabry disease

  

CONTROL SUBJECTS (n  =  20)

 

FABRY SUBJECTS (n  =  20)

 

M (incP&T)

M (exP&T)

p- value

M (incP&T)

M (exP&T)

p- value

LVEDV (ml)

163 ± 6

179 ± 6

<0.001

127 ± 7

160 ± 8

<0.001

LVESV (ml)

54 ± 4

71 ± 3

<0.001

34 ± 2

56 ± 3

<0.001

LVSV (ml)

108 ± 5

105 ± 5

0.2

103 ± 7

100 ± 8

0.3

LVEF (%)

67 ± 1

61 ± 1

<0.001

73 ± 1

65 ± 1

<0.001

LVM (g)

130 ± 6

113 ± 6

<0.001

178 ± 14

144 ± 12

<0.001

LVM indexed (g/ m2)

66 ± 3

58 ± 3

<0.001

98 ± 8

79 ± 7

<0.001

  1. LVEDV = left ventricular end-diastolic volume, LVESV = left ventricular end-systolic volume, LVSV = left ventricular stroke volume, LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction, LVM = left ventricular mass, SV = stroke volume.
Back to article page

Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

ISSN: 1532-429X

Contact us