Table 1 Real-time CMR acquisitions, which measured hemodynamic values and compared results with standard retrospective cine imaging
Publication: | Exposure time (ms) | Frame rate-1 (ms) | Trajectory | Parallel imaging | Compressed sensing | Result: |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bauer, et al. I J Cardiovasc Imag 2013 [1] | 315 | 63 | Radial | SENSE | No | 28 % underestimate |
125 | 25 | Radial | 4 % underestimate | |||
Voit, et al. JCMR 2013 [2] | 40 | 40 | Radial | SENSE | Yes | 10 % underestimate |
Muthurangu, et al. Radiology 2008 [3] | 40 | 16 | Radial | Yes | No | EF: 1.2 % lower |
Boll et al. JCMR 2005 [4] | 83 | 42 | Radial | No | No | 4 % underestimate |
Kuehl, et al. Radiology 2004 [5] | 208 | 100 | Radial | No | No | Wall Motion: Comparable |
Spuentrup, et al. Radiology 2003 [6] | 200 | 67 | Radial | No | No | No Sig Diff |
Spiral | ||||||
No Sig Diff | ||||||
Range: | 40-315 | 16-100 |