Table 2 Comparison between the reference LA volumes the CS-cineCMR combined with the 3D non-model-based and the model-based bi-plane area-length reconstruction. Acquisition strategies A1 to E3 are explained in Fig. 1
Acquisition | CS-cineCMR 3D non-model based Recon. | Reference | Diff | Diff [%] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Volume [ml] | Volume [ml] | Volume [ml] | |||
Oval big | A1 | 51.0 | 54.0 | −3.0 | −5.8 % |
A2 | 50.9 | −3.1 | −6.0 % | ||
A3 | 52.8 | −1.2 | −2.3 % | ||
Oval small | B1 | 45.7 | 51.0 | −5.3 | −11.0 % |
B2 | 46.4 | −4.6 | −9.5 % | ||
B3 | 46.5 | −4.5 | −9.2 % | ||
Oval oblique | C1 | 55.3 | 61.0 | −5.7 | −9.8 % |
C2 | 55.3 | −5.7 | −9.9 % | ||
C3 | 54.4 | −6.6 | −11.5 % | ||
Spherical | D1 | 48.2 | 55.0 | −6.8 | −13.3 % |
D2 | 47.2 | −7.8 | −15.3 % | ||
D3 | 49.8 | −5.2 | −10.0 % | ||
Curved | E1 | 65.8 | 70.0 | −4.2 | −6.1 % |
E2 | 67.5 | −2.5 | −3.6 % | ||
E3 | 65.3 | −4.7 | −6.9 % | ||
All | - | 53.5 ± 7.3 | 58.2 ± 7.0 | −4.7 ± 1.8 | −8.7 ± 3.5 % |
Oval big | A1 | 52.67 | 54.0 | −1.33 | −2.5 % |
A2 | 50.29 | −3.71 | −7.1 % | ||
A3 | 46.51 | −7.49 | −14.9 % | ||
Oval small | B1 | 48.38 | 51.0 | −2.62 | −5.3 % |
B2 | 47.76 | −3.24 | −6.6 % | ||
B3 | 45.03 | −5.97 | −12.4 % | ||
Oval oblique | C1 | 55.92 | 61.0 | −5.08 | −8.7 % |
C2 | 57.28 | −3.72 | −6.3 % | ||
C3 | 42.57 | −18.43 | −35.6 % | ||
Spherical | D1 | 50.10 | 55.0 | −4.90 | −9.3 % |
D2 | 51.66 | −3.34 | −6.3 % | ||
D3 | 49.96 | −5.04 | −9.6 % | ||
Curved | E1 | 61.02 | 70.0 | −8.98 | −13.7 % |
E2 | 63.23 | −6.77 | −10.2 % | ||
E3 | 54.29 | −15.71 | −25.3 % | ||
All | - | 51.8 ± 5.8 | 58.2 ± 7.0 | −6.4 ± 4.8 | −11.5 ± 8.5 % |