Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison between the Simpson’s method vs. Biplane method using MTT and Manual (n = 29)

From: Left atrial structure and functional quantitation using cardiovascular magnetic resonance and multimodality tissue tracking: validation and reproducibility assessment

Manual

Biplane

Simpson’s

P

r

P

Vmax (ml)

84.3 ± 34.6

88.1 ± 35.2

0.08

0.95

<0.001

LAEF

0.44 ± 0.1

0.34 ± 0.1

<0.001

0.88

<0.001

LAPEF

0.21 ± 0.22

0.17 ± 0.23

<0.001

0.70

<0.001

LAAEF

0.36 ± 0.08

0.28 ± 0.07

<0.001

0.70

<0.001

MTT

Biplane

Simpson’s

P

r

P

Vmax (ml)

86.5 ± 33.6

85.2 ± 35.2

0.53

0.95

<0.001

LAEF

0.46 ± 0.1

0.33 ± 0.10

<0.001

0.85

<0.001

LAPEF

0.22 ± 0.21

0.16 ± 0.23

<0.001

0.57

0.002

LAAEF

0.38 ± 0.09

0.27 ± 0.06

<0.001

0.61

<0.001

  1. Results are reported as mean ± standard deviation
  2. Abbreviations: Vmax left atrial maximal volume, LAEF left atrial total ejection fraction, LAPEF left atrial passive ejection fraction, LAAEF left atrial active ejection fraction, r Pearson coefficient