Skip to main content
Fig. 5 | Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Fig. 5

From: Quantitative three-dimensional myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance with accurate two-dimensional arterial input function assessment

Fig. 5

Comparison of in-vivo 2D-AIF and 3D-AIF at low and high dose. 2D-AIF vs. scaled 3D-AIF at (a) low and (b) high dose. The 3D-AIF was scaled by the average signal intensity ratio in the last four time points. Arrows highlight signal distortion of the 3D-AIF due to non-linearity between signal intensity and concentration

Back to article page

Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

ISSN: 1532-429X

Contact us