Table 4 Large Animal and Human ASL-CMR methods used in different studies. To date, with exception of the spASL technique, all studies used the FAIR labeling approach combined with different readout strategies
Author | Year | Post-labeling delay | Labeling method | Imaging method | Quantification |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Capron [75] | 2014 | HR dependent | spASL | bSSFP | spASL |
Wang [20] | 2010 | 200 - 1700Â ms | FAIR | bSSFP | Signal Difference |
Zun [48] | 2009 | 1 RR | FAIR | bSSFP | Signal Difference |
Northrup [76] | 2007 | (1-12)RR + 91-177 ms | FAIR | GRE | Dual T1 |
Wacker [69] | 2003 | 100 -1400Â ms | FAIR-sat | FLASH | Dual T1 |
Poncelet [67] | 1999 | 1 RR | FAIR | EPI | Signal Difference |