|
Variables
|
CMR
|
BARI
|
APPROACH
|
|---|
|
Total MaR
|
30 (7.7- 56.9)
|
28.5 (12-50)
|
28.0 (12-48)
|
|
Infarct related artery
|
|
LAD
|
42 (32-49)
|
41 (33-46)
|
44 (30-47)
|
|
LCx
|
40 (35-46)
|
34 (32-37)
|
30 (28-40)
|
|
RCA
|
26 (22-32)
|
27 (22-29)
|
28 (24-28)
|
|
Disease pattern
|
|
One-vessel disease
|
31 (25-44)
|
29 (27-40)
|
28 (27-44)
|
|
Two-vessel disease
|
31 (25-39)
|
30 (25-34)
|
28 (28-28)
|
|
Three-vessel disease
|
24 (22-32)
|
22 (22-26)
|
24 (22-28)
|
|
Collateral flow grade 0
|
31 (24-43)
|
30 (25-39)
|
28 (27-44)
|
|
Collateral flow grade 1
|
31 (27-39)
|
28 (27-36)
|
28 (27-29)
|
|
Collateral flow grade 2 or 3
|
21 (7-26)
|
27 (22-29)
|
28 (22-28)
|
- Data on percentage myocardium at risk are presented as median and interquartile range (in brackets). There were no significant differences between the methods according to infarct-related artery or underlying coronary disease pattern. LAD left anterior descending coronary artery, RCA right coronary artery, LCx left circumflex coronary artery, CMR cardiac magnetic resonance, MaR myocardium at risk. There were no statistically significant differences between the MaR and collateralization for each of the angiographic techniques and CMR. Friedman test p = 0.157 and 0.06 respectively for collaterals 0 vs 2 and 3
