Skip to main content
Fig. 2 | Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Fig. 2

From: Fully quantitative cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion ready for clinical use: a comparison between cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography

Fig. 2

The relationship between PET and CMR for global myocardial perfusion rest and stress included, a). The dashed line represents the line of regression. The solid line indicates the line of identity. b Bland-Altman plots for the difference between PET and CMR for global MP. The solid line represents the mean difference between the two methods and the dashed lines indicate +2SD and -2SD, respectively. There is strong correlation and small bias between PET and CMR for assessing global MP. CMR = cardiovascular magnetic resonance, MP = myocardial perfusion, PET = positron emission tomography

Back to article page