Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of the main diagnostic quality scores for 2D and iNAV-3D LGE iNAV-3D LGE: Image-Navigated Late Gadolinium Enhancement, n: number, NS: not significant

From: ‘Image-navigated 3-dimensional late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: feasibility and initial clinical results’

Diagnostic performance

Global LGE detection

2D (n = 22)

55% (12)

iNAV-3D (n = 22)

55% (12)

Segmental LGE detectiona (P = 0.28)

 

0

1

2

3

4

5

2D (n = 352)

75.9% (267)

10.2% (36)

3.7% (13)

7.7% (27)

2% (7)

0.6% (2)

iNAV-3D (n = 352)

78.1% (275)

8.5% (30)

2% (7)

7.4% (26)

3.4% (12)

0.6% (2)

LGE transmural extentb (P = NS)

 

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

2D (n = 352)

268

6

7

10

13

14

34

iNAV-3D (n = 352)

275

3

3

5

19

30

17

  1. aSegmental LGE detection: 0 = no LGE, 1 = ischaemic, 2 = patchy, 3 = subepicardial, 4 = mid wall, 5 = RV insertion points bTransmural extension: 0, 1 = 1–25%, 2 = 26–50%, 3 = 51–75%, 4 = 76–100%, 5 = striae, 6 = diffuse
Back to article page

Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

ISSN: 1532-429X

Contact us