Skip to main content
Fig. 2 | Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Fig. 2

From: Quantitative cardiovascular magnetic resonance: extracellular volume, native T1 and 18F-FDG PET/CMR imaging in patients after revascularized myocardial infarction and association with markers of myocardial damage and systemic inflammation

Fig. 2

Pooled comparison (a-c) and individual regressions (d-f) between sector values from all three imaging methods. These are 18F-FDG vs. ECV (a/d), 18F-FDG vs. native T1 (b/e) and ECV vs. native T1 (c/f). Plots (a-c) each include results from all 662 sectors from all 25 patients and the correlation between subjects. Plots (d-f) visualize the different slopes of individual linear regressions and show the respective correlation factors within subjects

Back to article page

Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

ISSN: 1532-429X

Contact us