|  | Agreement (%) | Disagreement (%) |
---|
 |  |  | Auto. better | Man. better | Not sure |
---|
Analyst 1 | Basal | 40.0 | 26.2 | 20.6 | 13.2 |
 | Mid-ventricular | 84.8 | 12.2 | 2.4 | 0.6 |
 | Apical | 44.0 | 29.0 | 22.0 | 5.0 |
Analyst 2 | Basal | 33.0 | 27.4 | 17.4 | 22.2 |
 | Mid-ventricular | 91.6 | 6.6 | 1.8 | 0.0 |
 | Apical | 80.8 | 8.8 | 9.6 | 0.8 |
- Two experienced image analysts visually compared automated segmentation to manual segmentation for 250 test subjects and assessed whether the two segmentations achieved a good agreement (visually close to each other) or not. If there was a disagreement between the two, the analysts would score in three categories: automated segmentation performs better; manual segmentation performs better; not sure which one is better. The visual assessment was performed for basal, mid-ventricular and apical slices. The percentage of each score catetory is reported