Skip to main content
Fig. 11 | Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Fig. 11

From: In vitro optimization and comparison of CT angiography versus radial cardiovascular magnetic resonance for the quantification of cross-sectional areas and coronary endothelial function

Fig. 11

Box-and-whisker plots comparing static and moving phantom experiments. a Accuracy, b precision, c limit of detection (LOD), d signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and e circularity of cross-sectional area (CSA) measurements for computed tomography angiography (CTA) and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). For this comparison, CTA data were acquired using 5 mGy, 100 kVp, and 6% iodine, and reconstructed with 90% adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V (ASiR-V). ** indicates p ≤ 0.01; ***, p ≤ 0.001; ****, p ≤ 0.001

Back to article page