Skip to main content

Table 2 Performance of the proposed automatic method

From: Quantification of aortic pulse wave velocity from a population based cohort: a fully automatic method

Measure

N

Manual

Automatic

R (CI for β)

B-A (95% CI)

Abs diff

Centerline length (mm)

198

131.6 ± 20.2

130.6 ± 19.5

0.98 (0.97, 0.98)

-1.0 (-9.3, 7.3)

3.3 ± 2.8

Inter-observer centerline length (mm)

45

132.0 ± 20.8#

132.5 ± 20.1&

0.97 (0.95, 0.99)

0.5 (-9.0, 10)

3.4 ± 3.4

Transit time foot-to-foot (ms)

186

16.7 ± 8.2

16.0 ± 5.7

0.98 (0.97, 0.98)

-0.1 (-2.4, 2.1)

0.9 ± 2.4

Transit time half-max (ms)

192

16.4 ± 5.0

16.5 ± 5.0

0.99 (0.99, 0.99)

0.1 (-1.1, 1.2)

0.4 ± 0.5

Transit time cross-correlation (ms)

192

14.4 ± 4.6

14.5 ± 4.7

0.97 (0.97, 0.98)

0.1 (-1.9, 2.2)

0.5 ± 0.9

Pulse wave velocity foot-to-foot (m/s)

186

9.5 ± 5.7

9.5 ± 5.2

0.89 (0.86, 0.92)

0.0 (-5.0, 5.0)

0.8 ± 0.9

Pulse wave velocity half-max (m/s)

192

8.8 ± 3.3

8.7 ± 3.4

0.99 (0.98, 0.99)

-0.1 (-1.2, 1.1)

0.4 ± 0.5

Pulse wave velocity cross-correlation (m/s)

192

10.4 ± 5.8

10.2 ± 5.5

0.98 (0.97, 0.98)

-0.2 (-2.6, 2.1)

0.7 ± 1.0

  1. N is the number of measurments, Manual is the measurements obtained using the manual method (mean ±SD), Automatic is the measurement obtained using the proposed automatic method (mean ±SD), R is the Pearson correlation coefficient along with the linear regression β confidence interval (CI). B-A is the Bland-Altman bias along with the 95% CI. Abs diff is the average absolute difference between the manual and automatic measurements (mean ±SD). # Observer 1 and & Observer 2