Skip to main content

Table 4 Agreement between manual and automated segmentations. Agreement was analysed in the entire study group (n = 300) as well as in subgroups according to field strength, aortic valve replacement and repaired Tetralogy of Fallot

From: Fully automated quantification of biventricular volumes and function in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: applicability to clinical routine settings

 

Parameter

Mean Difference (SD of the Diff.)

ICC (95% CI)

CoV (%)

All

LV Mass

2.4 (9.3)

0.95 (0.94–0.97)

14.6

(n = 300)

LV EDV

5.0 (7.9)

0.98 (0.94–0.99)

8.5

LV ESV

4.4 (11.1)

0.96 (0.94–0.97)

25.0

LV SV

0.3 (7.3)

0.91 (0.89–0.93)

15.1

LV EF

−2.5 (5.9)

0.95 (0.92–0.97)

10.6

RV EDV

7.4 (12.0)

0.92 (0.81–0.96)

14.0

RV ESV

−1.6 (9.8)

0.92 (0.89–0.93)

24.0

RV SV

9.0 (10.6)

0.73 (0.26–0.87)

23.5

RV EF

5.8 (9.6)

0.72 (0.47–0.83)

17.8

1.5 T

LV Mass

4.0 (7.2)

0.96 (0.91–0.98)

11.7

(n = 132)

LV EDV

4.4 (8.4)

0.98 (0.96–0.99)

8.8

LV ESV

2.9 (6.1)

0.99 (0.98–1.00)

12.2

LV SV

1.1 (6.4)

0.95 (0.92–0.96)

13.7

LV EF

−1.5 (4.9)

0.97 (0.96–0.98)

9.3

RV EDV

10.6 (9.6)

0.90 (0.33–0.97)

11.7

RV ESV

2.1 (8.0)

0.94 (0.91–0.96)

20.5

RV SV

8.5 (8.8)

0.72 (0.11–0.88)

20.6

RV EF

3.9 (8.8)

0.77 (0.62–0.86)

16.5

3 T

LV Mass

0.1 (9.7)

0.97 (0.95–0.98)

13.2

(n = 90)

LV EDV

5.5 (7.3)

0.98 (0.91–0.99)

7.8

LV ESV

6.9 (17.7)

0.88 (0.79–0.92)

40.5

LV SV

−1.4 (8.5)

0.84 (0.75–0.89)

17.1

LV EF

−3.8 (6.9)

0.92 (0.83–0.96)

12.3

RV EDV

5.8 (12.2)

0.89 (0.79–0.94)

15.0

RV ESV

−0.7 (7.9)

0.94 (0.92–0.96)

20.7

RV SV

6.2 (11.0)

0.64 (0.35–0.79)

25.3

RV EF

4.1 (8.4)

0.83 (0.68–0.90)

15.3

Aortic Valve replacement

LV Mass

1.3 (11.5)

0.89 (0.76–0.94)

16.7

(n = 31)

LV EDV

5.0 (7.7)

0.97 (0.91–0.99)

8.7

LV ESV

5.5 (5.6)

0.97 (0.76–0.99)

14.8

LV SV

−0.4 (7.6)

0.93 (0.85–0.96)

15.2

LV EF

−4.4 (6.4)

0.92 (0.73–0.97)

10.8

RV EDV

6.0 (13.9)

0.90 (0.78–0.95)

16.6

RV ESV

−6.9 (10.6)

0.86 (0.60–0.94)

28.9

RV SV

12.8 (15.0)

0.54 (0.00–0.79)

31.6

RV EF

10.3 (13.7)

0.54 (0.00–0.79)

23.7

Tetralogy of Fallot

LV Mass

2.9 (11.3)

0.75 (0.55–0.86)

23.0

(n = 47)

LV EDV

5.6 (7.8)

0.91 (0.69–0.96)

9.4

LV ESV

3.1 (6.4)

0.83 (0.66–0.91)

18.7

LV SV

1.9 (6.5)

0.87 (0.76–0.93)

13.1

LV EF

−1.5 (5.3)

0.73 (0.52–0.85)

8.9

RV EDV

2.6 (14.3)

0.94 (0.90–0.97)

13.5

RV ESV

− 10.1 (10.5)

0.82 (0.25–0.93)

20.2

RV SV

13.0 (9.4)

0.81 (0.00–0.94)

17.4

RV EF

11.3 (7.5)

0.41 (0.00–0.73)

14.8

  1. Biventricular volumes and LV mass were indexed to body surface area. T: Tesla. SD standard deviation, ICC intraclass correlation coefficient, CoV coefficient of variation, LV left ventricular, RV right ventricular, EDV/ESV end-diastolic/systolic volume, SV stroke volume, EF ejection fraction