Skip to main content

Table 3 Volume and dimension differences (%) between the positive and negative means generated from each of the linear regression morphometric modes

From: Right ventricular shape and function: cardiovascular magnetic resonance reference morphology and biventricular risk factor morphometrics in UK Biobank

 

Smoking

Chol

Previous MI

Diabetes

Angina

HBP

Obesity

RV EDV

−3.1

−1.5

4.2

−3.4

0.7

−0.1

8.5

RV ESV

−1.7

−2.1

4.3

−2.6

−1.1

−2.4

10.1

RV Eccen.

0.514

−0.77

3.91

−0.58

− 0.38

− 0.89

− 0.72

RV Spher.

− 0.08

1.2

0.04

− 0.24

0.77

−0.33

1.21

RV Short.

−1.74

− 1.8

2.19

−0.02

1.85

1.84

−1.36

LV EDV

−1.7

−2.2

11.7

−3.3

1.6

1.4

7.3

LV ESV

0.6

−4.2

18.4

−2.5

0.8

1.0

7.8

LV Mass

−0.5

−3.1

5.4

−1.3

1.7

5.1

13.9

LV MVR

1.2

−0.8

−7.1

1.9

0.1

3.7

7.1

LV RWT

1.1

−0.7

−5.8

1.2

0.1

3.1

6.4

LV Eccen.

−0.07

0.2

0.02

0.6

0.1

0.9

1.4

LV Spher.

−0.2

−0.2

8.4

0.1

1.0

−1

2.1

LV Short.

−0.9

0.8

−3.6

0.2

1.8

0.8

−0.1

  1. EDV end-diastolic volume, ESV end-systolic volume, Eccen. eccentricity, Spher. sphericity, Short longitudinal shortening, LV MVR left ventricular mass to volume ratio, LV RWT left ventricular relative wall thickness