Skip to main content

Table 3 Results for diagnostic performance of different measurement approaches

From: Multiparametric cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in acute myocarditis: a comparison of different measurement approaches

 

Cut off

AUC

Sensitivity (%)

Specifity (%)

PPV (%)

NPV (%)

Accuracy (%)

Native T1 (ms)

 Global

> 980

0.903

85

90

93

79

87

 mSAX

> 985

0.850

76

93

95

72

83

 ConSept

> 999

0.783

65

97

97

62

77

 Remote

> 980

0.841

73

90

91

69

80

ECV (%)

 Global

> 31

0.731

47

88

87

49

62

 mSAX

> 28

0.717

67

72

81

56

69

 ConSept

> 27

0.633

70

52

71

50

63

 Remote

> 29

0.685

64

68

76

55

66

T2 (ms)

 Global

> 54

0.847

80

87

90

74

82

 mSAX

> 53

0.831

78

87

90

72

81

 ConSept

> 53

0.820

80

87

90

74

82

 Remote

> 54

0.799

74

87

89

70

79

  1. ECV extracellular volume fraction, mSAX midventricular short axis, NPV negative predictive value, PPV positive predictive value
Back to article page

Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

ISSN: 1532-429X

Contact us