Skip to main content

Table 4 Summary of results of Bland-Altman analyses

From: Accelerated aortic 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance using compressed sensing: applicability, validation and clinical integration

Comparison

Net Flow [ml/cycle]

Peak Flow [ml/s]

Peak Velocity [cm/s]

MD ± SD

CI of the MD

MD ± SD

CI of the MD

MD ± SD

CI of the MD

Intertechnique

 S2 vs. CS4

1.3 ± 8.0

(− 0.4; 2.9)

2.7 ± 20.4

(− 1.5; 6.9)

− 4.8 ± 8.1

(− 8.8; 0.7)

 S2 vs. CS6

1.3 ± 7.1

(− 0.2; 2.7)

3.1 ± 22.3

(− 1.5; 7.7)

− 6.3 ± 12.0

(− 12.4; 0.3)

 S2 vs. CS8

2.2 ± 7.8

(0.6; 3.8)

4.6 ± 25.2

(− 0.6; 9.9)

−7.9 ± 13.0

(− 14.4; − 1.3)

 S2 vs. CS10

5.4 ± 8.0

(3.7; 7.0)

14.4 ± 28.3

(8.6; 20.3)

− 4.0 ± 12.2

(− 10.2; 2.2)

Inter-Observera

 S2_1 vs. S2_2

−1.3 ± 2.6

(− 2.2; − 0.3)

−1.1 ± 6.7

(− 3.5; 1.3)

  

 CS6_1 vs. CS6_2

−0.4 ± 2.8

(− 1.4; 0.7)

2.1 ± 9.5

(−1.3; 5.5)

  

Intra-Observera

 S2_1 vs. S2_2

−0.4 ± 1.9

(−1.1; 0.2)

−0.7 ± 8.1

(− 3.6; 2.2)

  

 CS6_1 vs. CS6_2

−0.2 ± 2.3

(− 1.1; 0.6)

− 2.1 ± 10.7

(− 6.0; 1.7)

  

Scan-Rescanb

 S2_1 vs. S2_2

− 0.7 ± 4.9

(− 2.4; 1.1)

1.9 ± 26.3

(− 7.5; 11.3)

5.1 ± 4.9

(0.9; 9.4)

 CS6_1 vs. CS6_2

− 0.2 ± 8.5

(−3.2; 2.9)

4.8 ± 32.1

(− 6.7; 16.2)

2.1 ± 11.6

(− 8.0; 12.3)

 CS8_1 vs. CS8_2

− 1.5 ± 8.9

(−4.7; 1.7)

6.9 ± 42.5

(− 8.3; 22.1)

14.8 ± 38.2

(− 18.7; 48.3)

  1. Data are given as mean difference (MD) ± standard deviation (SD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of the mean differences. The main data sample considers 6 contours from each of in total 15 subjects. a Results for inter- and intraobserver analysis were only extracted from AAo and DAo1. b Scan-rescan measurements were performed in 5 volunteers