Skip to main content

Table 2 Evaluation of segments by conventional coronary angiography, contrast-enhanced coronary cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography (CE-CCMRA) and dual-source coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA)

From: A direct comparison of 3 T contrast-enhanced whole-heart coronary cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography to dual-source computed tomography angiography for detection of coronary artery stenosis: a single-center experience

ArteryNo. of Segments ≥ 1.5 mm on x-rayNo. of Assessable Segments on CE-CCMRA (%)No. of Assessable Segments on DS-CCTA (%)
LM5151 (100%)51 (100%)
 Proximal5150 (98%)51 (100%)
 Middle5149 (96%)51 (100%)
 Distal4843 (90%)46 (96%)
 Diagonal branches5643 (77%)50 (89%)
 Proximal5150 (98%)51 (100%)
 Distal4134 (83%)37 (90%)
 Marginal branches6139 (64%)53 (87%)
 Proximal5150 (98%)51 (100%)
 Middle5149 (96%)51 (100%)
 Distal4946 (94%)47 (96%)
 PDA/PL9374 (80%)80 (86%)
Total654578 (88%)619 (95%)
  1. DS-CCTA dual-source coronary computed tomography angiography, CE-CCMRA contrast-enhanced coronary cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography, LAD left anterior descending coronary artery, LCX left circumflex coronary artery, LM left main coronary artery, PDA/PL posterior descending artery/posterolateral branch, CAG conventional coronary angiography, RCA right coronary artery, CE contrast-enhanced