Skip to main content

Table 2 Evaluation of segments by conventional coronary angiography, contrast-enhanced coronary cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography (CE-CCMRA) and dual-source coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA)

From: A direct comparison of 3 T contrast-enhanced whole-heart coronary cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography to dual-source computed tomography angiography for detection of coronary artery stenosis: a single-center experience

Artery

No. of Segments ≥ 1.5 mm on x-ray

No. of Assessable Segments on CE-CCMRA (%)

No. of Assessable Segments on DS-CCTA (%)

LM

51

51 (100%)

51 (100%)

LAD

 Proximal

51

50 (98%)

51 (100%)

 Middle

51

49 (96%)

51 (100%)

 Distal

48

43 (90%)

46 (96%)

 Diagonal branches

56

43 (77%)

50 (89%)

LCX

 Proximal

51

50 (98%)

51 (100%)

 Distal

41

34 (83%)

37 (90%)

 Marginal branches

61

39 (64%)

53 (87%)

RCA

 Proximal

51

50 (98%)

51 (100%)

 Middle

51

49 (96%)

51 (100%)

 Distal

49

46 (94%)

47 (96%)

 PDA/PL

93

74 (80%)

80 (86%)

Total

654

578 (88%)

619 (95%)

  1. DS-CCTA dual-source coronary computed tomography angiography, CE-CCMRA contrast-enhanced coronary cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography, LAD left anterior descending coronary artery, LCX left circumflex coronary artery, LM left main coronary artery, PDA/PL posterior descending artery/posterolateral branch, CAG conventional coronary angiography, RCA right coronary artery, CE contrast-enhanced