Skip to main content

Table 3 Diagnostic Performance of CE-CCMRA and DS-CCTA

From: A direct comparison of 3 T contrast-enhanced whole-heart coronary cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography to dual-source computed tomography angiography for detection of coronary artery stenosis: a single-center experience

 

CE-CCMRA

DS-CCTA

p Value

Patient-based analysis

n = 51

n = 51

 

Sensitivity

93.5 (29/31) [77.2–98.9]

93.5 (29/31) [77.2–98.9]

> 0.05

Specificity

85.0 (17/20) [61.1–96.0]

90.0 (18/20) [66.9–98.2]

> 0.05

PPV

90.6 (29/32) [73.8–97.5]

93.5 (29/31) [77.2–98.9]

> 0.05

NPV

89.4 (17/19) [65.5–98.2]

90.0 (18/20) [66.9–98.2]

> 0.05

Vessel-based analysis

n = 153

n = 153

 

Sensitivity

93.0 (53/57) [82.2–97.7]

94.7 (54/57) [84.5–98.6]

> 0.05

Specificity

89.6 (86/96) [81.3–94.6]

90.7 (87/96) [82.5–95.4]

> 0.05

PPV

84.1 (53/63) [72.3–91.7]

85.7 (54/63)[74.1–92.9]

> 0.05

NPV

95.6 (86/90) [88.4–98.6]

96.7 (87/90) [89.9–99.1]

> 0.05

  1. Values are n/n (%); values in brackets are 95% confidence intervals
  2. NPV negative predictive value, PPV positive predictive value