Skip to main content

Table 3 Diagnostic Performance of CE-CCMRA and DS-CCTA

From: A direct comparison of 3 T contrast-enhanced whole-heart coronary cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography to dual-source computed tomography angiography for detection of coronary artery stenosis: a single-center experience

 CE-CCMRADS-CCTAp Value
Patient-based analysisn = 51n = 51 
Sensitivity93.5 (29/31) [77.2–98.9]93.5 (29/31) [77.2–98.9]> 0.05
Specificity85.0 (17/20) [61.1–96.0]90.0 (18/20) [66.9–98.2]> 0.05
PPV90.6 (29/32) [73.8–97.5]93.5 (29/31) [77.2–98.9]> 0.05
NPV89.4 (17/19) [65.5–98.2]90.0 (18/20) [66.9–98.2]> 0.05
Vessel-based analysisn = 153n = 153 
Sensitivity93.0 (53/57) [82.2–97.7]94.7 (54/57) [84.5–98.6]> 0.05
Specificity89.6 (86/96) [81.3–94.6]90.7 (87/96) [82.5–95.4]> 0.05
PPV84.1 (53/63) [72.3–91.7]85.7 (54/63)[74.1–92.9]> 0.05
NPV95.6 (86/90) [88.4–98.6]96.7 (87/90) [89.9–99.1]> 0.05
  1. Values are n/n (%); values in brackets are 95% confidence intervals
  2. NPV negative predictive value, PPV positive predictive value