Skip to main content
Fig. 1 | Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Fig. 1

From: Is a timely assessment of the hematocrit necessary for cardiovascular magnetic resonance–derived extracellular volume measurements?

Fig. 1

Schematic illustration of the conventional (a) and inline extracellular volume (ECV) methods (b). a The conventional ECV method derives a partition coefficient (λconv) using averaged T1 values from regions-of-interests (ROIs) drawn in the myocardium and blood in native and postcontrast T1 maps. The ECV values are calculated from three different hematocrits (Hct). ECV0 is derived from an Hct0 measured on the same day as cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) exam; ECV1 is derived using Hct1, which is measured on a different day; ECVsyn is derived using Hctsyn[conv] which is calculated from the native blood T1. b Inline partition coefficient (λ) mapping is automatically generated on a pixelwise basis after image registration of the native and postcontrast T1 maps. The blood mask is automatically generated from native T1 mapping and used to estimate Hctsyn[inline]. Three inline ECV maps were reconstructed with Hct0, Hct1, and Hctsyn[inline]. Three ECV values, ECV0, ECV1, and ECVsyn, are directly measured from three different inline ECV maps using the same myocardial ROI for T1 mapping

Back to article page