Skip to main content

Table 3 Left Ventricular volume measurements with Conventional and CS cine CMR

From: Comparison between conventional and compressed sensing cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance for feature tracking global circumferential strain assessment

 

Conventional cine (n = 65)

CS cine (n = 65)

Mean difference

P value

EDV (ml)

112.1 [95.7, 140.0]

111.4 [95.6, 154.9]

0.3 ± 8.3

0.84

ESV (ml)

47.2 [33.5, 78.6]

51.0 [34.3, 79.1]

-0.3 ± 6.4

0.36

SV (ml)

65.4 [52.8, 73.9]

62.1 [48.9, 76.4]

0.6 ± 9.8

0.70

Mass (g)

92.6 [75.8, 120.3]

92.2 [75.1, 117.3]

0.9 ± 5.9

0.29

EF (%)

58.6 [46.4, 66.3]

57.2 [46.2, 64.4]

1.1 ± 5.4

0.09

  1. Data are presented as the medians [first quartile, third quartile]
  2. Mean differences are presented as mean ± standard deviation
  3. EDV end-diastolic volume, EF ejection fraction, ESV end-systolic volume, SV stroke volume