Skip to main content

Table 4 Results of GCS and GCS rate from conventional and CS cine CMR

From: Comparison between conventional and compressed sensing cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance for feature tracking global circumferential strain assessment

 

Conventional cine (n = 65)

CS cine (n = 65)

p

GCS (%)

− 16.1 [− 11.9, − 19.3]

− 17.1 [− 11.7, − 19.5]

0.508

GCS rate (s−1)

− 0.8 [− 0.6, − 1.0]

− 0.8 [− 0.7, − 1.0]

0.587

  1. Data are presented as the median [first quartile, third quartile]
  2. CS compressed sensing, GCS global circumferential strain