From: Comparison between conventional and compressed sensing cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance for feature tracking global circumferential strain assessment
Conventional cine (n = 65)
CS cine (n = 65)
p
GCS (%)
− 16.1 [− 11.9, − 19.3]
− 17.1 [− 11.7, − 19.5]
0.508
GCS rate (s−1)
− 0.8 [− 0.6, − 1.0]
− 0.8 [− 0.7, − 1.0]
0.587