Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of maximum 2D cine CMR vs 3D self nav CMR aortic root diameters

From: 2D cine vs. 3D self-navigated free-breathing high-resolution whole heart cardiovascular magnetic resonance for aortic root measurements in congenital heart disease

2D cine vs. 3D self nav

Observer 1

Observer 2

CuCo max

CuCu max

CuCo max

CuCu max

Mean diameter 2D cine (mm)

36.2

38.5

35.8

38.2

Mean diameter 3D self nav (mm)

37.2

39.7

37.3

39.5

Mean difference (mm)

− 1.0

− 1.2

− 1.6

− 1.3

95% Limits of agreement (mm)

− 5.5 to 3.5

− 4.7 to 2.3

− 4.7 to 1.4

− 5.0 to 2.4

Standard deviation (mm)

2.3

1.8

1.5

1.9

Variance (mm2)

5.2

3.2

2.0

3.6

Pearson’s correlation (r)

0.945

0.951

0.985

0.964

P value (t-test)

0.006

 < 0.001

0.001

0.009

  1. 3D self nav 3D self-navigated high-resolution free-breathing whole heart, CuCo cusp to commissure, CuCu cusp to cusp, max maximum