Skip to main content
Fig. 3 | Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Fig. 3

From: The implications of magnetic resonance angiography artifacts caused by different types of intracranial flow diverters

Fig. 3

source images h falsely suggest severe stenosis on the right but not on the left

Patient with bilateral ophthalmic segment aneurysms who was treated with a Surpass (cobalt chromium) device on the right side and a Silk (nitinol) device on the left side. a The native image in the right oblique projection shows both devices. The native b and subtracted c images in right oblique projection of the right carotid angiogram, as well as the native and subtracted images d, e of the left carotid angiogram in the same projection and a lateral projection with caudal angulation f are unremarkable for residual aneurysms or parent artery stenosis. MPR reconstructions of noncontrast MRA g and axial

Back to article page