Skip to main content

Table 2 Diagnostic performance of 3D whole-heart coronary CMRA compared with coronary CTA

From: Clinical comparison of sub-mm high-resolution non-contrast coronary CMR angiography against coronary CT angiography in patients with low-intermediate risk of coronary artery disease: a single center trial

 

Sensitivity

Specificity

PPV

NPV

Accuracy

Per Patient

100 (12/12) [76–100]

74 (28/38) [58–85]

55 (12/22) [35–73]

100 (28/28) [88–100]

80 (40/50) [67–89]

Per Vessel

81 (13/16) [57–93]

88 (115/130) [82–93]

46 (13/28) [30–64]

97 (115/118) [93–99]

88 (128/146) [81–92]

 RCA

60 (3/5) [23–93]

91 (41/45) [79–96]

43 (3/7) [16–75]

95 (41/43) [85–99]

88 (44/50) [76–94]

 LAD

88 (7/8) [53–99]

86 (36/42) [72–93]

54 (7/13) [29–77]

97 (36/37) [86–100]

86 (43/50) [74–93]

 LCx

100 (3/3) [44–100]

91 (39/43) [78–96]

43 (3/7) [16–75]

100 (39/39) [91–100]

91 (42/46) [80–97]

LM

N/A (0/0)

98 (49/50) [90–100]

0 (0/1) [0–95]

100 (49/49) [93–100]

98 (49/50) [90–100]

Per Segment

76 (16/21) [55–89]

95 (378/398) [92–97]

44 (16/36) [30–60]

99 (378/383) [97–99]

94 (394/419) [91–96]

 Proximal

70 (7/10) [40–89]

95 (173/182) [91–97]

44 (7/16) [23–67]

98 (173/176) [95–99]

94 (180/192) [89–96]

 Middle

100 (6/6) [61–100]

92 (82/89) [85–96]

46 (6/13) [23–71]

100 (82/82) [95–100]

93 (88/95) [86–96]

 Distal

60 (3/5) [23–93]

97 (123/127) [92–99]

43 (3/7) [16–75]

98 (123/125) [94–100]

95 (126/132) [90–98]

  1. Significant values are indicated in bold
  2. % (raw data) [95% confidence interval]
  3. RCA, Right coronary artery; LAD, Left anterior descdending coronary artery; LCx, Left circumflex coronary artery; LM, Left main coronary artery; PPV, Positive predictive value; NPV, Negative predictive value