Skip to main content
Fig. 2 | Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Fig. 2

From: Evidence-based cardiovascular magnetic resonance cost-effectiveness calculator for the detection of significant coronary artery disease

Fig. 2

Meta-model lifetime discounted quality-adjusted life year and cost results (compared to ‘No Imaging’). Squares indicate CMR, circles indicate CCT, colors indicate meta-model input sources, arrows represent comparisons of CMR vs. CCT for a given inputs source (strategies to the bottom and right to their comparators have higher quality adjusted life years (QALYs) and lower costs, i.e. they are dominant strategies), dotted lines represent cost-effectiveness thresholds (strategies below cost-effectiveness thresholds are good value compared to ‘No Imaging’)

Back to article page