Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison of selected model inputs from Ge et al. [13] and Genders et al. [20]

From: Evidence-based cardiovascular magnetic resonance cost-effectiveness calculator for the detection of significant coronary artery disease

Variable

Genders 2015 value [20]

Genders source(s)

Ge 2020 value [13]

Ge source(s)

CMR sensitivity

0.89

Jaarsma et al. [37]

0.89

Knuuti et al. [8]

CMR specificity

0.76

Jaarsma et al. [37]

0.87

Knuuti et al. [8]

CMR cost

$621

CPT 75563 and 93015

$807

CMS

CCTA sensitivity

0.98

Mowatt et al. [34], Scheutz et al. [36], von Ballmoos et al. [35]

0.90

Danad et al. [7]

CCTA specificity

0.89

Mowatt et al. [34], Scheutz et al. [36], von Ballmoos et al. [35]

0.71

Danad et al. [7]

CCTA cost (includes FFR for some patients)

$372

CPT 75574

$981

CMS

Age (years)

60

Assumption

62.5

Kwong et al. [46]

ICA cost

$2989

CPT 93454

$3941

CMS

CABG cost

$38,217

AHRQ 2011

$38,797

O’Sullivan et al. [47]

PCI cost

$6529

CPT 92980

$36,556

O’Sullivan et al. [47]

Prevalence of CAD

0.30

Nieman et al. [48]

32.4%

Kwong et al. [46]

Proportion male

Sex-specific analyses

Not applicable

53%

Kwong et al. [46]

  1. AHRQ Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, CABG coronary artery bypass grafting, CAD coronary artery disease, CCTA coronary computed tomographic angiography, CMR cardiovascular magnetic resonance, CPT current procedural terminology, ICA invasive coronary angiography, FFR fractional flow reserve, ICER incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, MACE major adverse cardiovascular event(s), MI myocardial infarction, PCI percutaneous coronary intervention, QALY quality-adjusted life year, SPECT single-photon emission computed tomography, XCA x-ray coronary angiography