Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of the contrast ratio (CR) and relative standard deviation (RSD) signal intensity

From: Efficient non-contrast enhanced 3D Cartesian cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography of the thoracic aorta in 3 min

Structures

CR dNAV

CR iNAV

Relative standard deviation (RSD) signal intensity dNAV

Relative standard deviation (RSD) signal intensity iNAV

Aortic root

2  (1.5, 2.4), p = 0.001*

1.5 (1.2, 1.7)

5.9 (4.2, 8.3), p = 0.8

5.6 (4.7, 6.6)

Mid ascending aorta

1.9 (1.4, 2.2), p = 0.16

1.5 (1.3, 1.9)

5.2 (3.9, 7.9), p = 0.05*

4.7 (2.5, 6.1)

Mid aortic arch

1.9 (1.2, 2.3), p = 0.006*

1.3 (1, 1.5)

6.2 (3.7, 8.4), p = 0.1

4.4 (3.8, 5.7)

Mid descending aorta

2.1 (1.5, 2.4), p < 0.001*

1.1 (1, 1.5)

5.1 (3.7, 7.4), p = 0.6

5.7 (6.8, 4.4)

Whole aorta

  

6.5 (4.6, 8.6), p = 0.002*

5.1 (4.4, 6.5)

  1. Comparison of the contrast ratio (CR) and relative standard deviation (RSD) signal intensity between the dNAV T2-prepared bSSFP and the iNAV T2-prepared bSSFP CMRA in four aortic segments and the whole thoracic aorta
  2. Asterisks (*) note the pairs with statistically significant difference in the contrast ratio and RSD of the signal intensity