Skip to main content
Fig. 2 | Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Fig. 2

From: Infarct quantification with cardiovascular magnetic resonance using "standard deviation from remote" is unreliable: validation in multi-centre multi-vendor data

Fig. 2

Illustration on how signal variability in remote region-of-interest (ROI) influences infarct quantification in a mathematical phantom. Given a fixed SD from remote (in the example 5 SD) a high signal variability in leads to infarct size underestimation, whereas low signal variability leads to overestimation. The white line indicate where the signal intensity curve is extracted from

Back to article page