Skip to main content
Fig. 4 | Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Fig. 4

From: Infarct quantification with cardiovascular magnetic resonance using "standard deviation from remote" is unreliable: validation in multi-centre multi-vendor data

Fig. 4

Accuracy of “n-SD from remote” method illustrated as scatter plot with reference infarct size on X-axis, and infarct size in percent of the slice for different ROI position, ROI size, and number of SD. The dashed line indicates line of identity. Note the large variability compared to reference scar size. The reason that reference is smaller than 50% is that only slices with no more than 50% of infarct circumference were included

Back to article page