Skip to main content
Fig. 6 | Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Fig. 6

From: Validation of 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonanceĀ in TIPS stent grafts using a 3D-printed flow phantom

Fig. 6

Correlation of 4D flow CMR- and 2D PC CMR-derived flow velocities. Preset flow rates were increased from 0.8 to 2.8Ā l/min and velocity measurements were performed using velocity encoding both at 1Ā m/s (black crosses) and at 2Ā m/s (red squares). Flow measurements were performed at indicated levels. 4D flow CMR-derived velocities were significantly correlated with 2D PC CMR-derived flow velocities at all vascular levels and within the stent graft (all rā€‰ā‰„ā€‰0.958 and all pā€‰ā‰¤ā€‰0.024). At velocity encoding of 1Ā m/s, velocity measurements were excluded if velocities exceeded velocity encoding and caused aliasing artifacts. At velocity encoding of 2Ā m/s, aliasing did not occur. SMVā€‰ā€‰superior mesenteric vein, SVā€‰ā€‰splenic vein, PVā€‰ā€‰portal vein, TIPSbā€‰ā€‰bare part of the stent, TIPSpā€‰ā€‰portal sided third of the stent, TIPSmā€‰ā€‰middle third of TIPS stent, TIPSvā€‰ā€‰venous sided third of the stent

Back to article page